NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Frank Gregorc
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Frank Gregorc
TEMPLESTOWE VIC 3106
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 20 September 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Nichola Wood-Smith
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to address the need for robust oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. The Act aims to ensure the protection of superannuation benefits by imposing responsibilities and standards on trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. It establishes a framework to prevent misconduct and ensure the financial stability and integrity of the superannuation sector. Under the authority of the SISA, the Commissioner of Taxation can disqualify individuals from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation industry if they are found to have contravened the Act, thereby safeguarding the interests of superannuation fund members. This legislative instrument underscores the policy objective of maintaining high standards of conduct and accountability within the superannuation industry to protect the retirement savings of Australians.
In line with the SISA, a disqualification notice was issued to Frank Gregorc, indicating that he has been disqualified from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity due to contraventions by the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities for which he was a responsible officer. The disqualification is effective from the date of the notice and carries serious legal consequences, including potential criminal penalties for continued involvement in the specified roles. Additionally, the notice informs the recipient of their right to request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days and the potential for the disqualification to be revoked under certain conditions. This notice serves as a formal notification and is recorded as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees involved in the management of superannuation entities, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards. In this instance, Frank Gregorc has been disqualified by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA due to the contravention of the Act by the corporate trustee for which Gregorc was a responsible officer. The disqualification stems from the seriousness of these contraventions, leading to an immediate effect upon issuance of the notice. This legislative action adheres to the Commonwealth jurisdiction, with details of the disqualification being published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation. Any person disqualified under this Act, aware of their status, faces criminal penalties if they act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. The disqualification can be subject to revocation at the initiative of the Commissioner or upon written application by the disqualified individual. Additionally, if aggrieved by the decision, the individual has the right to request reconsideration by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification issued under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs Frank Gregorc that he has been disqualified from being a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity (subsection 126A(6)). This disqualification arises from the Commissioner of Taxation's determination that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA, with Gregorc being a responsible officer at the time of these contraventions. The seriousness of the contraventions provided grounds for his disqualification, which takes immediate effect upon issuance of the notice (subsection 126A(2)).
The SISA imposes various obligations on individuals and entities within the superannuation industry. For responsible officers like Gregorc, these obligations include ensuring compliance with the SISA, which includes adherence to all statutory requirements and regulations governing superannuation entities. Failure to uphold these obligations can result in personal disqualification, as evidenced in this case. Additionally, trustees and other responsible officers must maintain high standards of governance, transparency, and fiduciary duty to protect the interests of superannuation fund members.
Under the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as, or be, a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds such a role (section 126K). The penalties for such an offence can be severe, with the maximum penalty being two years imprisonment. This underscores the importance of compliance with the Act and the serious consequences that can follow from non-compliance.
There are also provisions for the revocation of disqualification, which may occur either on the initiative of the Commissioner or following a written application by the disqualified person (subsection 126A(5)). Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner if Gregorc believes the decision is erroneous. Any request for reconsideration must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and must outline the reasons for dissatisfaction with the decision.