| Commonwealth of Australia | Gazette |
Published by the Commonwealth of Australia | GOVERNMENT NOTICES |
NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Francesco Manicastri
NARARA NSW 2250
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 2 October 2018
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Craig Blair
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to provide for the supervision of the superannuation industry, ensuring that the investments and operations of superannuation funds are managed in the best interests of members. This Act addresses the need for regulation and oversight within the superannuation sector, aiming to protect the financial well-being of superannuation fund members. The SISA was enacted by the Parliament of Australia, reflecting a policy objective to maintain high standards of governance and accountability within the superannuation industry. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals deemed unfit to manage superannuation entities, thereby safeguarding the interests of fund members and preserving the integrity of the superannuation system.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) is a Commonwealth statute that applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration of superannuation entities in Australia. Specifically, the Act applies to trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of bodies corporate that act in these capacities for superannuation entities. The geographic reach of the Act is national, as it applies across the Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring uniform standards and oversight of superannuation funds. The Act includes provisions for disqualifying individuals deemed unfit to manage superannuation funds, as illustrated in the disqualification notice issued to Francesco Manicastri. This notice, issued by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, is effective immediately upon issuance and is published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette as per the Act's requirements. Furthermore, the Act imposes criminal penalties for disqualified individuals who continue to act in their prohibited capacities, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. The Act also provides avenues for reconsideration of disqualification decisions by the Commissioner and allows for the potential revocation of disqualifications either by the Commissioner's initiative or upon application by the disqualified person.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides for the disqualification of individuals from acting as trustees or responsible officers of superannuation entities. In this instance, Francesco Manicastri has been disqualified by James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA, due to a determination that Mr Manicastri is not a fit and proper person to hold such a position (subsection 126A(6)). This disqualification is effective immediately upon issuance of the notice (subsection 126A(7)).
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties it governs. Firstly, it requires trustees and responsible officers to be fit and proper individuals, ensuring the integrity and proper management of superannuation entities. Additionally, section 126K of the SISA mandates that a disqualified person who is aware of their disqualification status must not act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. Failure to comply with this requirement constitutes an offence under the SISA.
The SISA sets out specific penalties and consequences for breaches of its provisions. Under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any capacity that involves managing or administering a superannuation entity. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years imprisonment. This stringent penalty underscores the importance of compliance with the Act's requirements.
Moreover, the Act provides avenues for review and potential revocation of the disqualification. According to subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either by the Commissioner on their own initiative or upon a written application by the disqualified individual. Additionally, section 344 of the SISA allows for the reconsideration of the disqualification decision by the Commissioner if the affected individual submits a written request within 21 days of receiving the notice, detailing the reasons why the decision should be reconsidered. These provisions ensure that the process is fair and that there are mechanisms in place to address potential errors or changes in circumstances.