NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Erol Dominique Ogun
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
EROL DOMINIQUE OGUN
MAROOCHYDORE QLD 4558
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contravention provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 24 May 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jenny McGuire
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to provide for the regulation of the superannuation industry, ensuring it is conducted in an efficient, honest, and fair manner. The Act was introduced to address the need for oversight and regulation of superannuation funds to protect the interests of members and beneficiaries. The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to provide for the regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry, with the policy objective of ensuring the efficient, honest, and fair conduct of the industry. The Act aims to protect the interests of members and beneficiaries by establishing a framework for the regulation of trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation funds. The notice of disqualification provided to Erol Dominique Ogun under subsection 126A(6) of the Act highlights the enforcement mechanisms available to the Commissioner of Taxation to ensure compliance with the Act and protect the interests of superannuation fund members and beneficiaries.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the management of superannuation funds within Australia, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians. This Act extends its reach across the entire Commonwealth, ensuring uniform supervision and regulation of superannuation entities nationwide. The Act's disqualification provisions, as evidenced by the notice to Erol Dominique Ogun, apply to any individual found to have contravened the Act's provisions seriously enough to warrant disqualification. The disqualification prevents the individual from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation industry, such as being a trustee or investment manager, with potential criminal penalties for non-compliance. The Act allows for the revocation of disqualification under specific conditions and provides a process for reconsideration of the decision by affected parties. Furthermore, the Act’s application can be extended or refined through subordinate instruments, ensuring it adapts to evolving industry practices and regulatory needs.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) referenced in the notice of disqualification pertain to subsection 126A(1) and subsection 126A(6). Subsection 126A(1) provides the authority for the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify a person from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation industry if they have contravened the SISA, while subsection 126A(6) mandates that the Commissioner must give written notice to the disqualified person of their disqualification. In this instance, Erol Dominique Ogun has been disqualified under these provisions.
The Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on Erol Dominique Ogun, prohibiting them from acting as, or being, a trustee, investment manager, custodian, responsible officer, or body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. This prohibition is intended to prevent disqualified individuals from influencing or managing superannuation funds, which could potentially harm the interests of superannuation fund members.
Failure to comply with the disqualification order can result in serious consequences. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any of the prohibited capacities, and the maximum penalty for such an offence is two years imprisonment. This penalty underscores the seriousness of the contraventions that led to the disqualification and the importance of adhering to the restrictions imposed by the Act. Additionally, subsection 126A(5) allows for the revocation of the disqualification under certain conditions, either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person.
Furthermore, the notice informs Erol Dominique Ogun that details of the disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, as required by subsection 126A(7) of the SISA. For those affected by the decision, section 344 of the SISA provides an avenue for reconsideration by the Commissioner, provided that a written request is made within 21 days of receiving the notice and includes reasons for dissatisfaction with the decision. This mechanism allows for a formal process of review, ensuring that any grievances or concerns regarding the disqualification can be addressed appropriately.