NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Emma Quayle
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To: Emma Quayle
LAKE GARDENS VIC 3355
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 19 October 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jaq McDougall
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for a regulatory framework to oversee the management and operations of superannuation funds in Australia, ensuring they operate efficiently, transparently, and in the best interest of their members. The SISA was introduced by the Australian Parliament and aims to protect superannuation fund members by enforcing compliance with high standards of governance and financial management. It provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals who have been responsible for corporate trustees that have breached the SISA, thereby safeguarding the integrity and stability of the superannuation system. This disqualification serves as a deterrent and a means of enforcing accountability among those entrusted with managing superannuation funds.
Under the SISA, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation can disqualify individuals from being involved with superannuation entities if it is determined that the corporate trustee has contravened the Act and the individual was a responsible officer at the time. The policy objective is to ensure that those who have demonstrated a lack of compliance with the SISA are prevented from participating in the management of superannuation funds, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation members. This legislative measure is intended to maintain public confidence in the superannuation system and to uphold the standards of financial stewardship expected of those managing these funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to responsible officers of corporate trustees in the superannuation industry, ensuring compliance with standards and regulations to protect superannuation funds. The Act, which operates on a national level, empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from performing certain roles if they are found to have contravened the Act while in office, as demonstrated in the case of Emma Quayle. This disqualification can occur if the contraventions are deemed serious enough to warrant such action. The disqualification's immediate effect underscores the Commonwealth's commitment to maintaining the integrity of superannuation management. Exclusions or exemptions from this Act are not specified within the notice, suggesting that the application is broad, although the Act may provide for such exceptions in other sections or through subordinate instruments. The notice also highlights that the disqualification details will be published, reinforcing transparency and accountability within the industry.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains several key provisions concerning the disqualification of responsible officers of corporate trustees in the superannuation industry. Subsection 126A(2) of the SISA provides that a person can be disqualified from performing certain roles within a superannuation entity if the corporate trustee they are associated with has contravened the Act and the contraventions are serious enough to warrant such a disqualification. This is precisely the action taken in the notice issued to Emma Quayle under subsection 126A(6), which notifies her that she has been disqualified from serving as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee due to the seriousness of the contraventions committed by the corporate trustee she was associated with.
The Act imposes several obligations on parties involved in the superannuation industry. Firstly, responsible officers must ensure that the corporate trustee adheres to the provisions of the SISA. If they fail in this duty and the contraventions are deemed serious, they may be disqualified from their roles. Furthermore, the Act mandates that any disqualifications be communicated formally to the affected individual, as evidenced in the notice issued to Emma Quayle. Additionally, section 126K of the SISA outlines the actions that a disqualified person must refrain from, including acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the SISA can lead to significant consequences. Section 126K stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any capacity related to a superannuation entity, such as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment, highlighting the seriousness with which the law treats breaches of these provisions. Additionally, the disqualification is not indefinite; subsection 126A(5) of the SISA allows for the possibility of revocation of the disqualification either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon written application by the disqualified person.
Lastly, the SISA provides a mechanism for recourse in cases where a person is dissatisfied with a disqualification decision. Section 344 of the Act allows an affected individual to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision and must include the reasons why the decision is considered incorrect. This provision ensures that there is a formal process for appealing or seeking a review of the disqualification decision.