NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – EMILIA WIDJAJA - 7 November 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Emilia Widjaja
ARNCLIFFE NSW 2205
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 7 November 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jenny McGuire
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for effective supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. This Act aims to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees, investment managers, and custodians act in the best interests of members and comply with the law. The SISA was introduced by the Australian Parliament and its policy objective is to provide a framework for the supervision of the superannuation industry, ensuring that funds are managed responsibly and that members' interests are safeguarded. One significant aspect of the Act is the power to disqualify individuals who contravene the provisions of the Act, which is intended to deter misconduct and maintain the integrity of the superannuation system. The Act includes mechanisms for disqualification and provides for the publication of such decisions, ensuring transparency and accountability within the industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and administration of superannuation funds, ensuring that trustees, investment managers, and custodians adhere to strict standards of conduct and fiduciary duty. The Act’s jurisdictional reach is Commonwealth-wide, applying uniformly across all states and territories in Australia. This legislation imposes a disqualification on individuals found to have contravened the Act, with the specific case of Emilia Widjaja highlighting the serious consequences of non-compliance. The disqualification prevents the individual from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, and doing so knowingly constitutes an offence with potential penalties of up to two years imprisonment. Additionally, the Act allows for the disqualification to be revoked either by the Commissioner's initiative or upon a written application from the disqualified person. Notably, any disqualifications under the Act are published as Notifiable Instruments in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and public accountability.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides the framework for the disqualification of individuals from participating in the superannuation industry. Under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA, a person can be disqualified from performing certain roles within a superannuation entity if there are grounds for such a disqualification. This includes instances where the individual has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and the seriousness of the contraventions justifies such a measure. The notice of disqualification, such as the one issued to Emilia Widjaja, informs the individual that they have been disqualified and specifies the effective date of the disqualification (subsection 126A(6)).
The obligations imposed by the SISA on disqualified individuals, as outlined in section 126K, are stringent. It is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or body corporate in such roles. This is to ensure that individuals who have been found to have contravened the SISA do not continue to engage in activities that could potentially harm superannuation entities or their members. Failure to adhere to these obligations can result in serious legal consequences.
The SISA also sets out the penalties for breaching the disqualification provisions. Section 126K stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to engage in the prohibited activities, with the maximum penalty being two years imprisonment. This reflects the seriousness with which the Act regards the integrity of the superannuation industry and the protection of superannuation members. Additionally, the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application from the disqualified individual, as per subsection 126A(5).
For those affected by a disqualification decision, the SISA provides a mechanism for reconsideration. Under section 344, an individual can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision if they are not satisfied with it. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the disqualification decision and should include the reasons why the individual believes the decision is wrong. This ensures that there is a process in place for addressing potential grievances or errors in the disqualification process.