NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Edie Ulrich
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Edie Ulrich
KARLKURLA WA 6430
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 2 November 2021
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Adrian Avolio
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for effective regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia. This legislation was introduced by the Parliament of Australia to ensure that superannuation entities are managed with integrity, and to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The primary policy objective of the Act is to maintain the financial stability and proper administration of superannuation funds, thereby safeguarding the retirement savings of Australians. The Act provides the Commissioner of Taxation with powers to disqualify individuals who have contravened the provisions of the Act, as demonstrated in the disqualification notice issued to Edie Ulrich under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA. Such disqualifications are intended to prevent individuals with a history of non-compliance from participating in the management of superannuation funds, thereby upholding the standards of the superannuation industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and management of superannuation funds in Australia. The Act primarily targets trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers who are directly involved in the administration of superannuation entities. The geographic reach of the Act is national, encompassing all jurisdictions within Australia. The Act provides a framework for the regulation and oversight of the superannuation industry to ensure compliance with financial and administrative standards. Under the Act, the Commissioner of Taxation has the authority to disqualify individuals who have contravened the Act's provisions, as demonstrated in the notice served to Edie Ulrich. This disqualification restricts the individual from acting in a supervisory or managerial capacity within the superannuation industry. The Act also outlines the penalties for those who continue to act in such roles while disqualified, including potential criminal charges and imprisonment. Furthermore, the Act allows for the revocation of disqualifications under certain conditions and provides a process for appealing the decisions made by the Commissioner.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains various provisions aimed at ensuring the proper administration and regulation of superannuation entities. In this particular case, subsection 126A(1) of the SISA allows for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened the Act on multiple occasions, with the number of contraventions providing sufficient grounds for such action. The disqualification notice (subsection 126A(6)) is issued to inform the affected individual, in this instance Edie Ulrich, that they have been disqualified under the Act. This notice, which takes effect immediately upon issuance, is detailed in a formal document signed by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, Emma Rosenzweig (subsection 126A(6)).
The SISA imposes specific obligations on individuals who are disqualified under its provisions. For example, section 126K of the SISA stipulates that a disqualified person must not act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, nor serve as a responsible officer or be part of a body corporate that fills these roles. Violation of these provisions constitutes an offence, with the potential penalty being up to two years in jail (subsection 126K). This legal framework aims to ensure that individuals who have demonstrated a pattern of non-compliance do not continue to influence or manage superannuation entities, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members.
The disqualification can be revoked under certain circumstances. As per subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner of Taxation or upon a written application by the disqualified person. This provision allows for the possibility of reinstatement if the disqualified individual can demonstrate that the grounds for their disqualification no longer apply. Additionally, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for the Commissioner to reconsider the disqualification decision if the affected person submits a written request within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification. This request must include the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect.