NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Donna Haslam
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
DONNA JANELLE HASLAM
SPRING MOUNTAIN QLD 4300
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 5 July 2021
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per John Macuz
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Australian Parliament to address the need for stringent regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry. The Act aims to ensure the protection of superannuation benefits by establishing a framework that governs the conduct of trustees, investment managers, and custodians within the industry. The enactment of the SISA was crucial in filling the legislative gap that existed in providing adequate safeguards for superannuation funds and their beneficiaries, thereby enhancing accountability and transparency. This Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from participating in the superannuation industry if they find them to have contravened the provisions of the Act, thus ensuring the integrity of the industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration of superannuation funds, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers. The Act is of Commonwealth jurisdiction, extending its reach across Australia to regulate the superannuation industry in a manner that protects the interests of fund members. The Act’s provisions can be extended or clarified through subordinate instruments, enabling the Commissioner of Taxation to implement specific regulations and guidelines that further define the scope and application of the Act. The disqualification of individuals such as Donna Janelle Haslam under this Act underscores its serious intent to enforce compliance and penalise significant breaches that may jeopardise the integrity and security of superannuation funds. Any person disqualified under the Act faces stringent restrictions, including a prohibition from acting in any capacity that involves the management of superannuation entities, with severe penalties, including imprisonment, for non-compliance.
Key Provisions
The primary sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) relevant to this notice of disqualification are subsections 126A(1) and 126A(6). Subsection 126A(1) allows for the disqualification of an individual if it is found that they have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and the seriousness of the contraventions warrants such action. Subsection 126A(6) mandates that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must give the disqualified individual written notice of the disqualification. In this instance, the notice was given to Donna Janelle Haslam, informing her that she has been disqualified from participating in the superannuation industry.
The Act imposes several obligations on the disqualified individual. Firstly, under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person who knows they are disqualified to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. This restriction is intended to prevent the disqualified individual from influencing or controlling superannuation funds, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. Additionally, under subsection 126A(7), details of the disqualification must be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette to ensure transparency and public awareness of the disqualification.
The consequences for breaching the provisions of the SISA are significant. Specifically, section 126K establishes that it is an offence for a disqualified person to engage in the prohibited activities mentioned above. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is imprisonment for up to two years. This underscores the seriousness with which the legislation treats breaches of its provisions, particularly those that could potentially harm the financial well-being of superannuation fund members. Furthermore, under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either by the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation on their own initiative or upon a written application from the disqualified individual. This provides a potential pathway for reinstatement if the individual can demonstrate that the circumstances that led to the disqualification have been rectified.
If Donna Janelle Haslam is affected by this decision and is not satisfied with it, she has the right to request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, as per section 344 of the SISA. This reconsideration request must be made in writing and must outline the reasons why she believes the decision is wrong. This provision ensures that individuals have an opportunity to challenge decisions that they believe are unjust or based on incorrect information, thereby providing a level of procedural fairness.