NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Debrah Ann Moore
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Debrah Ann Moore
Wanneroo WA 6065
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 23 January 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Rachael Anderson
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to provide a regulatory framework for the supervision of the superannuation industry, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring their funds are managed efficiently, honestly, and in their best interests. The Act was introduced to address the need for a comprehensive regulatory system to oversee the activities of trustees, investment managers, and custodians within the superannuation industry, thereby mitigating risks of misconduct and financial mismanagement. The SISA established a regime for the licensing and regulation of entities involved in the superannuation industry, aiming to enhance transparency, accountability, and the overall integrity of the sector. The policy objective of the Act is to safeguard the financial well-being of superannuation fund members by enforcing high standards of conduct and compliance within the industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration, management, or operation of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers. This Act operates on a national level, applying across the Commonwealth of Australia. It includes provisions for the disqualification of individuals found to have contravened its stipulations, particularly when the nature of the contraventions justifies such action. The Act's jurisdictional reach ensures that it applies uniformly across all states and territories of Australia, thereby maintaining consistent standards and regulations within the superannuation industry. Notably, the Act includes specific exclusions and exemptions, though these are not detailed in the notice itself. The application and enforcement of the Act can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, such as regulations or legislative rules, which provide further clarification or additional requirements for specific circumstances within the superannuation sector.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains several key sections relevant to the disqualification of individuals involved in the supervision of superannuation funds. Section 126A(1) allows for the disqualification of individuals found to have contravened the Act, and section 126A(6) mandates the issuing of a notice to the disqualified person, which in this case was delivered to Debrah Ann Moore. This notice informs the individual that they have been disqualified due to contraventions of the Act, with the seriousness of these contraventions justifying the disqualification. The disqualification becomes effective on the date of the notice.
Under the SISA, the obligations imposed on individuals such as Debrah Ann Moore include adhering to the legislative requirements governing the administration and management of superannuation entities. This includes ensuring compliance with all provisions of the Act to avoid any contraventions that could lead to disqualification. Failure to meet these obligations can result in significant consequences, including the disqualification outlined in the notice.
The Act also outlines specific offences and penalties for those who continue to act in a capacity they are disqualified from. Section 126K specifies that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity or to be a responsible officer or part of a body corporate that fulfils these roles. The maximum penalty for committing such an offence is a two-year jail term. This stringent penalty underscores the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches of its provisions.
Additionally, section 126A(5) of the SISA provides that the disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the authorities or upon a written application by the disqualified individual. This flexibility allows for potential reinstatement if the grounds for disqualification are no longer applicable. Furthermore, section 344 of the Act allows for the reconsideration of the disqualification decision by the Commissioner if the affected party is dissatisfied with the outcome. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and should include the reasons for the perceived error in the decision.