NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – DAVID SUPANDI
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
David Supandi
KENSINGTON NSW 1465
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 18 July 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Thomas Perry
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to address the need for robust oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members and beneficiaries. The Act establishes a framework for the supervision of superannuation funds and the entities that manage them, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards to maintain the integrity of the system. The Commonwealth Parliament enacted this legislation to mitigate risks associated with the management of superannuation funds and to provide a mechanism for holding responsible officers accountable for breaches of the law.
In this context, the notice of disqualification issued to David Supandi under the Act reflects its intent to enforce accountability within the superannuation industry. As a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, Emma Rosenzweig has exercised her authority to disqualify Supandi due to his role as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that contravened the Act. This action underscores the importance of the policy objective to deter misconduct and maintain high standards of governance within the superannuation sector, ultimately safeguarding the financial security of superannuation fund members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and management of superannuation funds in Australia. Specifically, the Act targets responsible officers and trustees of corporate trustees of superannuation entities, imposing obligations and restrictions on their conduct to ensure the proper management and administration of superannuation funds. The geographic reach of the Act is national, applying across all states and territories of Australia as a Commonwealth Act. The Act includes provisions for disqualification of responsible officers who are found to have contravened its provisions, and it stipulates penalties for those who continue to act in a prohibited capacity post-disqualification. The Act also allows for the revocation of disqualification under certain conditions and provides a mechanism for reconsideration of decisions by the Commissioner. There are no specific exclusions or thresholds mentioned in the text regarding who the Act applies to, but it generally extends to any person or entity involved in the management of superannuation funds within the specified scope.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains several key provisions that govern the disqualification of individuals from acting in certain roles within superannuation entities. Under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation can disqualify an individual if they are satisfied that a corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA, and the individual was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions. This disqualification is particularly warranted if the contraventions are serious enough to justify such action. The notice of disqualification, such as the one issued to David Supandi, must include specific details and is published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette as per subsection 126A(7).
For those affected by such a disqualification, the Act imposes clear obligations and requirements. Firstly, a disqualified person is prohibited from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer or a body corporate that holds such roles, as outlined in section 126K. This prohibition is intended to ensure that individuals who have been found to contravene the SISA do not continue to manage or influence superannuation entities in ways that could harm members or the integrity of the superannuation system. Compliance with these obligations is crucial to avoid further legal repercussions.
Failure to comply with these restrictions can result in serious consequences. Section 126K of the SISA stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to be, or act as, a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years imprisonment, highlighting the severity with which the Act treats such breaches. This penalty serves as a deterrent to ensure individuals adhere to the provisions of the SISA and the decisions made under its authority.
Additionally, the Act provides mechanisms for reviewing and potentially revoking a disqualification. Under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner of Taxation or upon a written application by the disqualified individual. This provision allows for a degree of flexibility and fairness in the system, enabling individuals to seek relief if they believe the disqualification was unjust or if circumstances have changed. Furthermore, under section 344, if a person is affected by a decision and is not satisfied with it, they can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision, provided they submit a written request outlining the reasons for their dissatisfaction.