NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
David Raynes
Tullamarine Vic 3043
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the nature and seriousness of the contravention provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 18 April 2017
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Colleen Shelton
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate the operations of superannuation funds and related entities in Australia. The Act was introduced to address the need for oversight and regulation in the superannuation industry to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The SISA was enacted by the Parliament of Australia and the policy objective was to ensure that superannuation funds are managed prudently, efficiently, and in the best interests of the members. The Act provides a framework for the regulation of superannuation funds, including provisions for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened the Act. The notice of disqualification issued under the Act informs the individual of the grounds for their disqualification and the consequences of the disqualification. The Act also provides for the publication of disqualification notices in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and administration of superannuation funds in Australia. The Act operates on a Commonwealth level, thus its provisions extend across the nation. This particular notice of disqualification is directed at an individual, David Raynes, who has been found to have contravened the Act, leading to his disqualification from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer of a body corporate that serves in such capacities. The disqualification takes immediate effect, prohibiting Mr. Raynes from engaging in any activities related to the management of superannuation funds. Furthermore, the Act stipulates that it is a criminal offence for a disqualified person to continue in such roles, with a potential penalty of up to two years imprisonment. The disqualification can be subject to revocation either by the delegate's own initiative or upon written application by the disqualified individual. Additionally, the Act provides for the Commissioner to reconsider the decision if the affected party is dissatisfied with the outcome, provided that the request for reconsideration is made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes several key provisions aimed at ensuring the proper management of superannuation funds. Under section 126A(1), the Act allows for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened the Act, with the grounds for such a decision outlined in subsection 126A(6). In the case of David Raynes, a notice of disqualification was issued by James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, asserting that David has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, warranting his disqualification. This disqualification takes effect immediately upon issuance of the notice, as stated in the document.
The SISA imposes specific obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. Section 126K, for instance, stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or part of a body corporate performing such roles. These roles are critical to the governance and management of superannuation funds, and the Act aims to prevent disqualified individuals from participating in such capacities to protect fund members.
Breaches of these provisions carry significant consequences. Section 126K outlines that knowingly acting in any of these roles while disqualified is an offence, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. This underscores the seriousness with which the Act treats contraventions related to the management of superannuation funds. Additionally, the notice mentions the potential for the disqualification to be revoked either by the delegate's initiative or upon a written application from the disqualified individual, as per subsection 126A(5).
For those who feel aggrieved by the disqualification, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for reconsideration. If David Raynes is dissatisfied with the decision, he has the right to request the Commissioner to reconsider it. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and must detail the reasons for the dissatisfaction. This provision ensures that there is a formal process for addressing grievances and potentially reversing the decision if there are valid grounds for reconsideration.