NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
David Kennedy
PARRAMATTA NSW 2150
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 18 February 2019
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Debra Goldfinch
Director Superannuation
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to establish a regulatory framework for the supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring the industry's integrity and stability. The Act was introduced to address issues such as mismanagement, fraud, and misconduct within the superannuation sector, which had been identified as significant concerns affecting the financial security of many Australians. The legislation was passed by the Australian Parliament, with a clear policy objective to safeguard superannuation funds and enhance public confidence in the system. The Act provides the Commissioner of Taxation with powers to oversee and regulate superannuation entities, including the authority to disqualify individuals who engage in serious misconduct or breaches of the law. This legislative framework is essential in maintaining the integrity of the superannuation system and ensuring that trustees and other responsible officers act in the best interests of fund members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) is Commonwealth legislation that applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation funds within Australia. The Act aims to ensure the integrity and soundness of the superannuation industry by regulating the conduct and activities of trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. It imposes obligations on these persons and entities to act in the best interests of the members of the superannuation funds they manage. The Act's jurisdictional reach extends across the entire Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring a uniform regulatory framework for the supervision of superannuation entities. Notably, the Act provides certain exclusions and exemptions, such as for small APRA-regulated funds and certain self-managed superannuation funds, by specifying thresholds or conditions that determine applicability. The scope of the Act can be further extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, such as regulations or legislative instruments, which may provide additional detail on specific aspects of the administration of superannuation funds.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) involved in this disqualification notice pertain to the authority of the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify an individual under subsection 126A(1) if there is a contravention of the Act, and the requirement to provide a notice of such disqualification under subsection 126A(6). In this case, David Kennedy has been disqualified due to the delegate's satisfaction that Kennedy contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, with the seriousness of the contraventions justifying the disqualification. The disqualification is effective immediately from the date of the notice.
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties it governs, including the requirement for trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities to adhere to the provisions of the SISA. Specifically, section 126K makes it an offence for a disqualified person to be, or act as, a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of such an entity. This obligation underscores the importance of maintaining compliance with the Act to avoid disqualification.
Any breach of these provisions can result in significant consequences. Under section 126K, a disqualified person who knowingly acts in contravention of the Act by being or acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity commits an offence, with the maximum penalty being two years imprisonment. Additionally, subsection 126A(5) allows for the revocation of the disqualification either on the initiative of the delegate or upon a written application by the disqualified person. This flexibility ensures that individuals have an avenue to potentially have their disqualification reconsidered if they meet certain criteria or demonstrate compliance with the Act.
For those who are dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for reconsideration. Any affected party can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving notice of the disqualification, provided the request is in writing and includes the reasons for believing the decision is incorrect. This process ensures that there is an opportunity for rectification or clarification if the initial decision is deemed unjust or erroneous.