NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – David John Samuel
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
David John Samuel
KIRKWOOD QLD 4680
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 8 February 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Susan Russell
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to address the need for effective regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia. The Act was introduced to ensure the integrity and financial soundness of superannuation funds and to protect the interests of members by establishing a robust regulatory framework. The legislation aims to mitigate risks and ensure compliance within the industry, thereby safeguarding the retirement savings of Australians. The Act provides mechanisms for the disqualification of individuals who are deemed unfit to manage superannuation funds, as a means to uphold the standards of the industry and maintain public trust. The policy objective of the SISA is to promote confidence in the superannuation system through stringent oversight and enforcement of compliance measures.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities within the superannuation industry, specifically those who are trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities. This Act, which operates at the Commonwealth level, imposes stringent regulations on the conduct of these individuals and entities to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act's scope extends to ensuring compliance with its provisions by disqualifying individuals who contravene its terms, as evidenced by the disqualification of David John Samuel. This disqualification serves as a significant deterrent against misconduct within the superannuation sector, with severe penalties, including a maximum of two years' imprisonment for those who continue to act in their disqualified capacity. The Act allows for the disqualification to be revoked under certain conditions, and provides for reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner if the affected party is dissatisfied with the outcome.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) that are pertinent to this notice include subsection 126A(1) (which empowers the delegate to disqualify an individual from participating in the superannuation industry) and subsection 126A(6) (which requires the delegate to give a written notice of the disqualification). Section 126A(7) provides that the details of the disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette. Furthermore, section 126K outlines the offence of a disqualified person acting in the capacity of a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, among other roles.
Under the SISA, the Act imposes several obligations on the parties it governs. Notably, it mandates that any disqualified person must refrain from acting in any capacity that involves the management or administration of superannuation funds. This includes roles such as trustee, investment manager, custodian, responsible officer, or any other similar position within a superannuation entity. These obligations are designed to uphold the integrity and proper management of superannuation funds and protect the interests of superannuation fund members.
In terms of consequences for breach, section 126K of the SISA stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any capacity that involves managing or administering superannuation funds. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years in jail. This severe penalty underscores the importance of adhering to the disqualification and the critical role that proper supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry plays in safeguarding the financial interests of superannuation fund members.
Additionally, subsection 126A(5) of the SISA provides that the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the delegate or upon a written application by the disqualified individual. This provision allows for some flexibility and potential recourse for those who have been disqualified if they can demonstrate that the circumstances warrant a reconsideration of their disqualification. Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA gives a disqualified person the right to ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision if they are not satisfied with it. This reconsideration request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the disqualification and must detail the reasons why the decision is considered incorrect.