NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – DAVID JOHN LESLIE - 9 May 2025
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
David John Leslie
COLLAROY NSW 2099
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 9 May 2025
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jaq McDougall
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to establish a regulatory framework governing the operations of superannuation entities, trustees, investment managers, and custodians. The Act aims to safeguard the financial interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that these entities are managed with integrity and competence. One of the critical provisions of the SISA is the ability to disqualify individuals from holding responsible positions within superannuation entities if they have engaged in conduct warranting such action. This legislative instrument serves to maintain the high standards of conduct expected in the superannuation industry. In the case of David John Leslie, he has been disqualified under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA due to his role as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that contravened the Act, with the severity of these breaches justifying his disqualification. The policy objective here is to deter misconduct and protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that those in responsible positions adhere to the highest standards of conduct.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation funds in Australia. Specifically, the Act targets responsible officers of corporate trustees of superannuation entities, ensuring that those in positions of influence within the superannuation industry adhere to stringent regulatory standards. The geographic reach of the Act is national, as it pertains to the Commonwealth of Australia and is applicable across all states and territories. The Act provides for disqualification of individuals who have been responsible officers at the time of significant contraventions by their corporate trustees, thereby protecting the integrity and security of superannuation funds. The disqualification not only prevents the individual from holding positions of responsibility within the superannuation sector but also carries significant penalties, including potential imprisonment, for those who knowingly contravene the terms of their disqualification. Additionally, the Act allows for the revocation of disqualification under certain conditions and provides avenues for reconsideration of decisions by affected parties.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) in this context include subsections 126A(2) and 126A(6). Under subsection 126A(2), a person can be disqualified from performing certain roles related to superannuation entities if they are a responsible officer of a corporate trustee and the trustee has contravened the SISA in a serious manner. Subsection 126A(6) mandates that the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must provide notice to the disqualified person, which includes details of the disqualification and its effects. This notice is evidenced by the document addressed to David John Leslie, informing him of his disqualification and the reasons behind it.
The Act imposes several obligations on parties and entities it governs, including the requirement for responsible officers to ensure that corporate trustees comply with the SISA. If a corporate trustee contravenes the SISA and the responsible officer was aware or should have been aware of these contraventions, the officer can be disqualified from future roles in managing superannuation entities. Additionally, there is an obligation for the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to notify the disqualified person and publish the details of the disqualification in the Federal Register of Legislation as stated under subsection 126A(7).
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as, or be, a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds such a role. The seriousness of this offence is underscored by the potential penalty of up to two years imprisonment, as outlined in the notice. This legal framework aims to maintain integrity and compliance within the superannuation industry by preventing disqualified individuals from re-entering roles where they could influence the management or oversight of superannuation entities.
The consequences for breach of these provisions are significant. As per section 126K, knowingly acting in a role after being disqualified is a criminal offence with severe penalties. The disqualification itself is a punitive measure intended to deter future misconduct by barring the individual from participating in the administration of superannuation funds. Additionally, under section 344 of the SISA, the Commissioner has the authority to reconsider a disqualification decision if the affected person submits a written request within 21 days of receiving notice, providing reasons for why the decision should be reconsidered. The potential for revocation of the disqualification under subsection 126A(5) offers a pathway for the disqualified person to potentially regain their eligibility, though this would depend on the circumstances and the discretion of the Commissioner.