| Commonwealth of Australia | Gazette |
Published by the Commonwealth of Australia | GOVERNMENT NOTICES |
NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
David Dundas
MARYLAND NSW 2287
I, John Ford, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contravention provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 7 May 2020
John Ford
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Alison Webster
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address the need for robust regulation and oversight of the superannuation industry, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act was introduced to fill a critical gap in the regulation of entities that manage superannuation funds, ensuring that these entities adhere to high standards of governance and conduct. The policy objective of the SISA is to maintain confidence in the superannuation system by preventing misconduct and promoting the efficient, honest, and faithful management of superannuation entities. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from managing superannuation entities if they are found to have contravened the Act's provisions, as demonstrated in the disqualification notice issued to David Dundas under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities within the superannuation industry, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The Act has a Commonwealth reach, impacting entities and individuals across Australia. The Act’s scope includes disqualifying individuals from performing roles in the superannuation industry if they have contravened its provisions, with the disqualification being enforced by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation. The Act’s application can extend or be restricted through subordinate instruments, allowing for the detailed regulation of conduct within the superannuation sector. The disqualification under this Act can be revoked on the initiative of the delegate or by a written application from the disqualified person. Notably, it is an offence for a disqualified person to continue acting in a capacity specified by the Act, with penalties including up to two years imprisonment. Additionally, the Act provides for reconsideration of disqualification decisions by the Commissioner within a specified timeframe.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides mechanisms for the disqualification of individuals found to have contravened the Act, as evidenced in the notice to David Dundas. Under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA, a person can be disqualified if there is evidence of a contravention of the Act, particularly when the seriousness of the contravention justifies such action. The disqualification is effective from the date the notice is made, as stated in the notice dated 7 May 2020 by John Ford, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation. The notice also mentions that details of the disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette as per subsection 126A(7) of the SISA.
The SISA imposes several obligations on the parties it governs, particularly those who manage superannuation entities. These obligations include adhering to the legislative requirements set out in the Act to ensure the proper management and operation of superannuation funds. Any contravention of the Act, whether minor or significant, can result in serious consequences, including disqualification. The notice to David Dundas highlights the seriousness of his contraventions, which led to his disqualification.
There are significant consequences for breaches of the SISA. Under section 126K of the Act, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years in jail, underscoring the gravity of the contraventions. Additionally, the notice informs David Dundas that the disqualification may be revoked under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, either on the initiative of the Commissioner of Taxation or upon his written application.
For those who feel aggrieved by the disqualification decision, the SISA provides a recourse. Under section 344 of the Act, an individual can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be in writing and should detail the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect. This provision ensures that there is a formal process for challenging the disqualification, offering a degree of procedural fairness to those affected.