NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
David Brodtmann
BAYSWATER VIC 3153
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1)of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the nature seriousness and number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 10 August 2017
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Colleen Shelton
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Australian Parliament to regulate the superannuation industry, ensuring compliance with standards of financial management and protection for superannuation funds. The Act was introduced to address issues related to the mismanagement, misuse, or improper handling of superannuation funds, with the aim of safeguarding the financial interests of superannuation fund members. The policy objective is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system by disqualifying individuals who have breached the provisions of the Act. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from participating in the administration of superannuation funds if they have contravened the Act in a manner that justifies such a measure. The disqualification is intended to prevent disqualified individuals from acting as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities, thereby protecting fund members from potential harm.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) is a Commonwealth Act that applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration of superannuation funds, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians. The Act aims to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that those who manage or invest their funds act with integrity and competence. The geographic reach of the Act is national, applying across Australia, and it is enforced by the Commissioner of Taxation. The Act includes provisions for disqualifying individuals who contravene its provisions, as evidenced by the notice of disqualification to David Brodtmann. Exclusions and exemptions are not explicitly mentioned in the provided text, but the Act may allow for certain categories of individuals or entities to be exempt under specific conditions. The application and enforcement of the Act can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, such as regulations made under the Act.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification provided under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs David Brodtmann that he has been disqualified from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation industry. This disqualification arises from a determination by James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, who is satisfied that Brodtmann has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, with the nature, seriousness, and number of the contraventions warranting such a measure. The disqualification becomes effective immediately upon issuance of the notice, which in this case is dated 10 August 2017.
The obligations imposed by the Act on individuals such as Brodtmann primarily concern their eligibility and capacity to engage in roles associated with superannuation entities. Specifically, under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act, or to be, a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or a body corporate in such a capacity. This extends to any involvement in managing or administering superannuation funds, effectively barring disqualified individuals from any role that involves direct or indirect control over these funds.
Should a disqualified person knowingly violate these provisions, they face severe consequences. As outlined in section 126K, the maximum penalty for such an offence is two years imprisonment. This stringent penalty underscores the seriousness with which the SISA treats breaches of its regulations, particularly those that compromise the integrity and management of superannuation funds.
Moreover, the Act provides mechanisms for both revocation of disqualification and reconsideration of the decision. Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification may be revoked either at the initiative of the Commissioner of Taxation or upon a written application by the disqualified person. Additionally, section 344 of the SISA allows for the Commissioner to reconsider a disqualification decision if the affected party submits a written request within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision, outlining the reasons why the decision should be reviewed. These provisions ensure that there is a formal process in place for addressing grievances and potentially rectifying the disqualification.