NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Darren Brown
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Darren Brown
PULLENVALE QLD 4069
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the nature and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 5 April 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Heather Reinke
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to provide a regulatory framework for the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members and beneficiaries. The SISA was introduced to address issues and gaps in the regulation of superannuation funds, ensuring they operate efficiently, transparently, and in the best interests of their members. The policy objective of the Act is to safeguard the retirement savings of Australians by imposing strict regulatory standards on the entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation funds.
In line with this objective, the SISA empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from participating in the management of superannuation entities if they have contravened the Act's provisions. This measure is intended to maintain the integrity of the superannuation industry by preventing those with a history of non-compliance from holding positions of responsibility within the sector.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and oversight of superannuation funds within Australia. The legislation specifically targets trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities, imposing stringent compliance requirements and oversight to ensure the integrity and security of superannuation funds. The geographic and jurisdictional reach of the SISA is national, applying to all superannuation entities across Australia, irrespective of state or territory boundaries. The Act extends its application through subordinate instruments, such as regulations and gazetted notices, to ensure consistent and comprehensive enforcement. Notably, the Act includes provisions for disqualifying individuals who have contravened its provisions, as evidenced by the disqualification notice issued to Darren Brown. This disqualification prohibits the named individual from acting in specified roles within superannuation entities, with severe penalties, including imprisonment, for non-compliance. Furthermore, the Act allows for the revocation of such disqualifications under certain conditions, providing a mechanism for redress while maintaining stringent oversight of the superannuation industry.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification issued under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs Darren Brown that he has been disqualified by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, due to his contravention of the SISA. The disqualification is based on subsection 126A(1) of the Act, which provides the authority for such action when the nature and seriousness of the contraventions warrant it. This notice, which comes into effect on the date it is issued, is a formal communication that Darren Brown is no longer eligible to perform certain roles within the superannuation industry.
The obligations imposed by the Act, as outlined in the notice, require Darren Brown to refrain from acting in any capacity as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer of a body corporate that performs these functions. These roles are critical in managing superannuation funds and the Act imposes strict requirements to ensure that individuals in these positions are of good standing and capable of managing the trust and investments of superannuation fund members.
Failure to adhere to the disqualification can result in significant legal consequences. As per section 126K of the SISA, it is a criminal offence for a disqualified person to act in any of the prohibited capacities. This offence carries a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment, underscoring the seriousness with which the Act treats such contraventions. The disqualification is not permanent, however, and subsection 126A(5) of the SISA allows for the possibility of revocation either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by Darren Brown himself.
For those who are aggrieved by the decision, section 344 of the SISA provides a recourse. If Darren Brown is dissatisfied with the decision to disqualify him, he has the right to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be made in writing and must specify the reasons for his dissatisfaction with the decision. This process ensures that there is a formal mechanism for reviewing and potentially overturning the disqualification if new evidence or arguments can be presented that justify a different outcome.