NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - DANNY UNTHANK
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
DANNY UNTHANK
CORLETTE NSW 2315
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 29 August 2021
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Naomi Douglas
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for robust supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring their funds are managed prudently and ethically. The SISA provides the legislative framework within which the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) oversee the compliance of superannuation entities and their officers. The Act was introduced by the Parliament of Australia, with a policy objective to safeguard the financial well-being and retirement security of Australians by ensuring the proper management and administration of superannuation funds. As a result of Danny Unthank's disqualification under the SISA, he is now prohibited from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or serving as a responsible officer of such entities, with serious legal consequences for any violations of this restriction.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and corporate entities that are involved in the management of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians. Specifically, the Act targets responsible officers of corporate trustees who have been involved in contraventions of the Act's provisions. The geographic and jurisdictional reach of the Act is national, as it is a Commonwealth Act. The Act's application can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, such as regulations or determinations. The Act provides certain exclusions, such as the possibility of having the disqualification revoked either on the delegate's own initiative or upon the disqualified person's written application. Furthermore, if a disqualified person acts in any capacity mentioned in the Act, it constitutes an offence with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. The decision to disqualify can be reconsidered by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision if the affected person is not satisfied with it.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes several key provisions, particularly those concerning disqualification of responsible officers. Under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA, a person can be disqualified if they were a responsible officer of a corporate trustee at the time of a contravention of the SISA, and the seriousness of the contraventions justifies such a disqualification. This process is formalised under subsection 126A(6), which mandates that a notice of disqualification must be issued to the individual concerned. In Danny Unthank’s case, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, issued the notice on 29 August 2021, indicating that he had been disqualified due to the corporate trustee’s contraventions of the SISA.
The Act imposes specific obligations on responsible officers of corporate trustees. These officers must ensure that the corporate trustee complies with all relevant provisions of the SISA. Failure to do so, if serious enough, can result in their disqualification. Furthermore, under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. This includes being a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds any of these roles, and knowingly continuing in such capacity while disqualified. Non-compliance with this provision can result in significant penalties, including up to two years of imprisonment.
The consequences of breaching the provisions of the SISA are stringent. Apart from the criminal offence mentioned under section 126K, the Act also allows for the disqualification of responsible officers who are found to have contravened its provisions seriously. The disqualification can be revoked under subsection 126A(5) either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person. Additionally, under section 344 of the SISA, an affected individual has the right to request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving notice, providing reasons for their dissatisfaction with the disqualification. This structured approach ensures that there is a clear process for both disqualification and potential review of such decisions.