NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – DANNY GEORGE
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
DANNY GEORGE
MORAYFIELD QLD 4506
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contravention provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 17 March 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Nichola Wood-Smith
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address the need for stringent oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry. This Act was introduced to safeguard the financial interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that the industry operates with integrity and transparency. The primary policy objective of the Act is to maintain the stability and reliability of superannuation funds by imposing strict standards on the conduct of trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers. The Act provides mechanisms for the disqualification of individuals who breach these standards, as evidenced by the disqualification notice issued under the Act to Danny George. This legislative framework ensures that any serious contraventions of the Act are met with appropriate disciplinary action, thereby protecting the retirement savings of Australians.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the management of superannuation entities, ensuring compliance with regulations designed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act covers trustees, investment managers, custodians, responsible officers, and body corporates that are involved in the administration of superannuation funds. The geographic reach of this legislation is national, as it operates under Commonwealth law. The Act’s provisions extend to any person or entity involved in the superannuation industry across Australia. Notably, there are exclusions and exemptions provided under the Act, although specific details are not provided in this notice. The application of the Act may also be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, such as regulations or guidelines issued under the authority of the Act. The disqualification of Danny George, as detailed in the notice, exemplifies the Act's enforcement mechanism to uphold compliance standards within the superannuation industry.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides a framework for the regulation of superannuation funds in Australia. Under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation can disqualify an individual from participating in the management of a superannuation entity if they have contravened the Act. In this case, Danny George has been disqualified by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, due to breaches of the SISA (subsection 126A(2)). This disqualification is effective from the date the notice is issued (subsection 126A(7)).
The SISA imposes obligations on trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities to adhere to certain standards and requirements, including those related to the proper management and investment of funds. Entities are required to act in the best interests of members and beneficiaries, maintain adequate records, and provide necessary information to the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Taxation Office (ATO). Danny George, as a disqualified person, is subject to these obligations, but his disqualification under section 126K of the SISA means he cannot act in any capacity that involves managing or being involved with superannuation entities.
Breaches of the SISA can result in severe consequences. Specifically, under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. This legal framework ensures that individuals who are deemed unfit to manage superannuation funds are prevented from doing so, thereby protecting the interests of fund members and beneficiaries.
Further, the SISA allows for the disqualification to be revoked either by the Commissioner's office on their own initiative or upon a written application by the disqualified individual (subsection 126A(5)). This provides a mechanism for individuals to seek reinstatement if they believe they have rectified the issues that led to their disqualification. Additionally, section 344 of the SISA offers a right to reconsideration by the Commissioner if Danny George is dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, requiring a written request within 21 days of receiving the notice, outlining the reasons for dissatisfaction.