Notice of Disqualification - Daniel P Bacelic

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au C2022G00377 In force Gazette

Legislation content

 

NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - Daniel P Bacelic

 

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993

 

 

 

To:

 

Daniel P Bacelic

 

SPOTSWOOD VIC 3015

 

I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) and 126A(3) of the SISA.

 

I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.

 

I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.

 

The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.

 

Dated: 5 May 2022

 

 

Emma Rosenzweig

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation

 

Per Susan Russell


Note 1:

Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.

 

Note 2:

Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:

    trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity

    responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity

 

The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.

 

Note 3:

Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.

 

Note 4:

Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.

 

 

Overview

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to provide a regulatory framework for the supervision of superannuation entities, ensuring their financial integrity and the protection of superannuation fund members. This Act was introduced to address the need for a robust regulatory system capable of preventing and responding to misconduct within the superannuation industry. The SISA is administered by the Australian Parliament, with the objective of maintaining high standards of governance and financial management within the superannuation sector. In this context, the legislation enables the disqualification of individuals who are deemed unfit to hold positions of responsibility within superannuation entities, thereby safeguarding the interests of fund members and promoting trust in the superannuation system. The disqualification of Daniel P Bacelic, as detailed in the notice, is a direct application of these provisions to ensure compliance and uphold the integrity of superannuation governance.

Scope and Application

The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and administration of superannuation entities in Australia. This includes trustees, responsible officers, and corporate trustees who oversee self-managed superannuation funds. The Act applies nationally, with its provisions extending to all jurisdictions within Australia. The Act also allows for the extension of its application through subordinate instruments, which may specify additional regulations or conditions relevant to the superannuation industry. Under the SISA, individuals such as Daniel P Bacelic can be disqualified from acting as trustees or responsible officers if they are found to be unfit or if they have been involved in the contravention of the Act. The disqualification is a serious measure, with potential criminal penalties for those who continue to act in a prohibited capacity post-disqualification. The Act also provides avenues for reconsideration of disqualification decisions and outlines the process for such appeals.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) that are referenced in the notice include subsection 126A(2), 126A(3), 126A(6), and 126A(7). These sections pertain to the disqualification of individuals who are deemed unfit or improper to hold positions of responsibility within superannuation entities. In this instance, Daniel P Bacelic has been disqualified under these subsections because he was a responsible officer of a corporate trustee at the time it contravened the SISA, and the seriousness of these contraventions justifies his disqualification. The notice also confirms that he is not considered a fit and proper person to be a trustee or responsible officer of a superannuation entity under the SISA. The SISA imposes several obligations on Daniel P Bacelic, including that he must not act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, nor can he be a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds such positions. These restrictions are in place because of the seriousness of the contraventions and the fact that he was a responsible officer at the time they occurred. Furthermore, the Act mandates that details of his disqualification be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, which serves as public notification of his disqualification. Breaching the provisions of the SISA, specifically subsection 126K, is a criminal offence. Daniel P Bacelic, knowing that he is disqualified, is prohibited from acting in any capacity as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity or as a responsible officer. Failure to comply with these provisions carries a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. This significant penalty underscores the importance of adhering to the disqualification and the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches. Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification of Daniel P Bacelic may be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon his written application. This provides a pathway for potential reinstatement should circumstances change. Additionally, under section 344 of the SISA, Daniel P Bacelic has the right to request a reconsideration of the decision if he is dissatisfied with it. This reconsideration request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification and must detail the reasons he believes the decision is incorrect.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Superannuation Law
Instrument
Gazette Notice
Concepts
Offence Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Administrative Discretion

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.