NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Cuong Tang
ROCKDALE NSW 2216
I, Ivan Parrett a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SIS Act as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SIS Act on one or more occasions and the nature and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 9 October 2012
Ivan Parrett
Assistant Commissioner of Taxation
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SIS Act, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SIS Act, we may revoke this disqualification order on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SIS Act, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days of the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) was enacted to address the need for oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. This legislation was introduced to ensure that superannuation funds are managed efficiently, transparently, and in the best interests of members. The SIS Act was enacted by the Australian Parliament with the policy objective of protecting the superannuation savings of Australians by regulating the industry and ensuring that those involved in managing these funds adhere to strict standards of conduct and accountability. This legislation provides the framework for the regulation and supervision of superannuation funds, trustees, and other related entities, aiming to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system. The Act addresses gaps in the regulation of the superannuation industry, particularly in relation to the conduct of trustees and responsible officers, and provides mechanisms for disqualification in cases of serious misconduct or breaches of the law.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and regulation of superannuation funds within Australia. The Act specifically targets those who act as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities, ensuring they adhere to the regulatory standards set forth to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. This includes individuals like Mr. Cuong Tang, who has been disqualified from serving in any capacity that involves the management or oversight of superannuation funds due to breaches of the SIS Act. The geographic reach of the Act is national, applying across all states and territories in Australia. The disqualification order, as noted, is effective immediately upon issuance and includes provisions for potential revocation and reconsideration processes, thereby providing a structured pathway for affected parties to seek redress or appeal the decision. The Act does not specify particular exclusions or thresholds but rather focuses on the nature and seriousness of contraventions to determine disqualification. The application and enforcement of the Act can be further refined through subordinate instruments issued under the authority of the Act.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) involved in this disqualification notice include subsection 126A(6) (subsection 126A(6)), which allows the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify a person from certain roles within a superannuation entity, and subsection 126A(1) (subsection 126A(1)), which provides the basis for the disqualification on the grounds of contraventions of the Act. This notice informs Mr Cuong Tang that he has been disqualified from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate involved in superannuation management because he has contravened the SIS Act.
Under the SIS Act, Mr Tang now faces restrictions on his involvement in the administration of superannuation funds, including roles as a trustee or a responsible officer. This prohibition aims to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that individuals who have breached the Act do not continue in positions of trust and responsibility. The Act imposes on Mr Tang an immediate cessation of his current roles, with the disqualification taking effect on the date of the notice (9 October 2012).
The notice also outlines the process for potential revocation of the disqualification. According to subsection 126A(5) (subsection 126A(5)), the disqualification can be revoked either by the delegate on their own initiative or upon a written application from Mr Tang himself. Additionally, section 344 (section 344) of the Act provides a mechanism for Mr Tang to request reconsideration of the disqualification decision by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be in writing and include the reasons for the dissatisfaction with the decision.
In terms of consequences, the disqualification itself is a significant restriction on Mr Tang's professional activities within the superannuation industry. Failure to adhere to the disqualification can lead to further legal actions and penalties. The SIS Act does not specify maximum penalties for non-compliance with the disqualification order in this context, but general contraventions of the Act can result in substantial fines and, in serious cases, imprisonment. This notice serves as a formal warning of the potential for further enforcement action if Mr Tang continues to engage in activities that are in breach of the Act.