NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Craig Fairhead - 26 February 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Craig Fairhead
DUNSBOROUGH WA 6281
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 26 February 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Cameron Watson
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to ensure the proper management and supervision of superannuation entities, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act was introduced to address significant issues and gaps in the regulation and oversight of superannuation funds, particularly concerning the conduct and responsibilities of trustees and responsible officers. The Act is overseen by the Australian Parliament, with the policy objective of maintaining the integrity and financial soundness of the superannuation industry. As illustrated in the notice of disqualification issued to Craig Fairhead on 26 February 2024, the SISA empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have contravened the Act, thereby ensuring accountability and compliance within the industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry in Australia, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of corporate trustees. The Act's jurisdiction is Commonwealth-wide, meaning it applies across all states and territories of Australia. The Act imposes stringent regulatory requirements on the superannuation industry to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The disqualification provisions under section 126A of the SISA specifically target individuals who are responsible officers of corporate trustees at the time of contraventions by the corporate trustee, with the seriousness of the contraventions being a critical factor in determining the applicability of the disqualification. This legislative instrument extends its reach through subordinate instruments, such as the Notifiable Instruments, which are used to publish details of disqualification notices in the Federal Register of Legislation. Furthermore, section 126K of the SISA criminalises the act of a disqualified person knowingly being or acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. The Act also provides avenues for the reconsideration of disqualification decisions by the Commissioner, as outlined in section 344.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides various provisions to oversee and regulate superannuation entities in Australia. Section 126A(6) requires the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to notify a person, such as Craig Fairhead in this case, of their disqualification under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA when there is a contravention of the Act by a corporate trustee, with the person being a responsible officer at the time. The disqualification takes immediate effect upon issuance of the notice, as stated in the document dated 26 February 2024. Additionally, section 126K of the SISA imposes an offence on a disqualified person knowingly acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. These provisions ensure the integrity and proper management of superannuation entities by enforcing accountability and responsibility among officers and trustees.
The SISA imposes several obligations on the parties it governs. Firstly, responsible officers must ensure compliance with the Act to avoid disqualification. Secondly, corporate trustees are required to operate within the legal framework set out by the SISA to maintain the trust and integrity of superannuation entities. These obligations are designed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members and uphold the regulatory standards set by the legislation. Failure to meet these requirements can result in significant consequences, including disqualification from managing superannuation entities.
The legislation also outlines specific consequences and penalties for breaches. Under section 126K of the SISA, any disqualified person who knowingly continues to act in a prohibited capacity, such as being a trustee or investment manager, commits an offence. The maximum penalty for this offence is a two-year jail term, highlighting the seriousness of non-compliance. Furthermore, the disqualification itself acts as a deterrent, preventing individuals from managing superannuation entities until the grounds for disqualification are resolved. These measures are crucial in maintaining the regulatory framework and protecting the superannuation system from potential misconduct.
The SISA also provides avenues for review and reconsideration of disqualification decisions. Section 344 of the SISA allows a disqualified person to request the Commissioner to reconsider their disqualification if they believe the decision is incorrect. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification and should include the reasons for dissatisfaction. This provision ensures that individuals have an opportunity to challenge the decision and seek rectification if they believe it was made in error. The notice also mentions that the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person, as per subsection 126A(5) of the SISA. These provisions balance the enforcement of regulatory standards with the rights of individuals to contest and potentially overturn unjust disqualifications.