NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Christos Konstandis - 28 January 2025
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Christos Konstandis
WAIKIKI WA 6169
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 28 January 2025
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Narinder Singh
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address issues within the supervision of the superannuation industry, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring the proper conduct and management of superannuation entities. The Commonwealth Parliament introduced this Act to establish a framework for the regulation and oversight of the superannuation industry, with a particular focus on maintaining the integrity and stability of superannuation funds. The policy objective of the Act is to ensure that trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities adhere to stringent standards, thereby safeguarding the financial well-being of superannuation members. In the context of a disqualification notice issued under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA, the Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have contravened its provisions, with the seriousness of the contraventions being a key consideration in such decisions.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers. The Act's jurisdiction is Commonwealth-wide, governing the conduct of persons and entities involved in superannuation activities across Australia. The Act provides for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened its provisions, as evidenced by the notice of disqualification issued to Christos Konstandis. This disqualification prohibits the disqualified person from acting in certain capacities related to superannuation entities, with significant penalties for non-compliance. The disqualification can be revoked under specific conditions, and the decision can be subject to reconsideration by the Commissioner within 21 days of notification. The Act also extends its application through subordinate instruments, allowing for the regulation and enforcement of its provisions.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides significant powers for the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals involved in the supervision of superannuation entities if they have contravened the Act. Section 126A(1) allows for disqualification, and the decision to disqualify is communicated through a Notice of Disqualification, as illustrated in subsection 126A(6). Such a notice, served on Christos Konstandis on 28 January 2025, outlines that he has been disqualified due to contraventions of the Act. The disqualification becomes effective immediately upon the issuance of the notice, as stated in the notice itself.
The Act imposes various obligations on individuals who are not disqualified, ensuring that those involved in the superannuation industry adhere to its regulatory standards. Under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. This prohibition is designed to maintain the integrity and proper functioning of superannuation entities by preventing disqualified individuals from influencing or managing these entities. Such actions by a disqualified person can result in significant penalties, including up to two years of imprisonment, as provided by the same section.
Breaching the terms of disqualification set out in the SISA can lead to severe consequences. Section 126K makes it clear that knowingly acting in any of the prohibited capacities while disqualified constitutes a criminal offence, with the potential for imprisonment. Additionally, the disqualification itself can be revoked under subsection 126A(5), either by the Commissioner's initiative or upon the written application of the disqualified person. This provision allows for flexibility and potential reinstatement once the grounds for disqualification have been addressed.
In the event that a disqualified person, like Christos Konstandis, believes that the disqualification is unjust, they have the right to request reconsideration under section 344 of the SISA. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification, and it must include the reasons for believing that the decision is incorrect. This mechanism ensures that individuals have an opportunity to contest the decision and seek redress if they feel it is erroneous or unfairly applied.