NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – CHRISTOPHER JOSEY
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
CHRISTOPHER JOSEY
REDLAND BAY QLD 4165
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 30 August 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Maria Iacopino
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to ensure that the superannuation industry operates in a way that protects the interests of members and beneficiaries. The Act was introduced to address the need for regulation and supervision of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians, to prevent misconduct and ensure the proper management of superannuation funds. The policy objective of the SISA is to maintain confidence in the superannuation system by promoting efficient, honest, and responsible service to members. The legislation provides for the regulation of superannuation entities and the disqualification of individuals who have engaged in misconduct that is serious enough to warrant such action. The enactment of the SISA is a critical step towards safeguarding the financial well-being of Australians who rely on superannuation funds for their retirement.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation funds in Australia. The Act specifically targets responsible officers of corporate trustees, including Christopher Josey in this instance, who have been disqualified from managing superannuation entities due to breaches of the Act's provisions. The disqualification, issued by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, is effective immediately and includes the requirement that the disqualified person cannot act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or be associated with any such roles. This disqualification is not limited to any particular geographic area but extends nationally as it is under Commonwealth legislation. Any attempt by a disqualified person to contravene this restriction is subject to significant penalties, including up to two years in jail. Additionally, the Act allows for the potential revocation of the disqualification either by the Commissioner of Taxation or upon a written application by the disqualified individual. Disqualified individuals also have the right to request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification issued to Christopher Josey under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs him that he has been disqualified from being involved in superannuation entities as a responsible officer of the corporate trustee, due to the serious contraventions committed by the corporate trustee. The disqualification becomes effective on the date the notice is issued, as stated in subsection 126A(6). This means that Christopher Josey is immediately barred from acting in any capacity that would involve him in the management or oversight of superannuation entities.
The Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on the parties it governs, particularly focusing on the responsibilities of responsible officers within corporate trustees. Under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA, a person can be disqualified if they are a responsible officer and the corporate trustee has contravened the Act in a serious manner. This obligation ensures that those in key positions within superannuation entities are held accountable for compliance with the Act. Furthermore, under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of such a body corporate.
The legislation also outlines the consequences for breaches of the disqualification provisions. Under section 126K, any disqualified person who knowingly acts in the prohibited capacities can be subject to criminal penalties, including a maximum of two years imprisonment. This severe penalty underscores the seriousness with which the Act treats compliance with disqualification orders. Additionally, subsection 126A(5) of the SISA provides that the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the delegate or upon the written application of the disqualified person. This offers a pathway for reconsideration and potential reinstatement, provided the disqualified person can demonstrate sufficient grounds for revocation.