NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – CHRISTOPHER BINDLEY - 13 May 2025
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Christopher Bindley
PALM BEACH QLD 4221
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 13 May 2025
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Susan Russell
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993, enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, was introduced to ensure the proper supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. This legislation aims to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by establishing a robust regulatory framework. One of the key provisions of the Act includes the ability to disqualify individuals who have acted as responsible officers when the corporate trustee of a superannuation entity has contravened the Act. This disqualification mechanism is intended to deter misconduct and maintain the integrity of the superannuation system. The policy objective underpinning this Act is to safeguard the financial well-being of superannuation fund members by ensuring that those who manage these funds adhere to high standards of governance and compliance.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to various individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, including trustees, responsible officers, and bodies corporate acting as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities. The act imposes obligations and prohibitions on these entities and individuals to ensure the proper management and regulation of superannuation funds. The geographic and jurisdictional reach of the SISA is national, as it is a Commonwealth Act. The legislation provides certain exclusions and exemptions, but these are not detailed in the provided text. The application of the Act can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, which may provide further clarification or specific regulations pertaining to the administration and enforcement of the Act. In this particular case, the disqualification of Christopher Bindley is a direct application of the Act's provisions, highlighting its implications for individuals who contravene the SISA as responsible officers of corporate trustees.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification issued under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs Christopher Bindley that he has been disqualified from being a responsible officer of a superannuation entity. The disqualification arises from subsection 126A(2) of the SISA, which allows for such action if a corporate trustee has contravened the SISA and Christopher Bindley was the responsible officer at the time of these contraventions. The notice specifies that the disqualification is effective from the date of the notice, which in this case is 13 May 2025. This action is taken by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, who is satisfied that the number of contraventions justifies the disqualification.
The Act imposes several obligations on the parties it governs. For instance, under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of such a body corporate. This includes any entity that manages or holds assets for superannuation purposes. The Act requires that individuals who are disqualified must not engage in these roles to prevent further potential breaches or mismanagement of superannuation funds. Compliance with this requirement is essential to maintain the integrity and proper functioning of the superannuation industry.
The consequences for breaching these provisions are significant. According to the SISA, it is a criminal offence for a disqualified person to act in any of the prohibited roles, and the maximum penalty for such an offence is two years imprisonment. This strict penalty underscores the seriousness with which the law views the management of superannuation funds and the need to protect the interests of superannuation beneficiaries. The disqualification notice also indicates that the details of this disqualification will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and accountability.
Furthermore, the SISA provides mechanisms for potentially reversing the disqualification. Under subsection 126A(5) of the Act, the disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner of Taxation or upon a written application from the disqualified person. This allows for a potential review and reinstatement of the disqualified individual's status, provided that the grounds for the original disqualification are no longer applicable. Additionally, section 344 of the SISA offers recourse for those dissatisfied with the decision. Affected individuals can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving notice, provided the request is made in writing and includes reasons for dissatisfaction with the original decision. This process ensures that there is an avenue for appeal and correction of any potential errors in the disqualification process.