NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Chetan Deviya
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Chetan Deviya
ORAN PARK NSW 2570
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the nature of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 6 July 2022
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jenny McGuire
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for a regulatory framework governing the supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia. This legislation was introduced to ensure the protection of superannuation fund members by promoting the proper administration of funds and the integrity of trustees and other responsible officers. The Act was passed by the Australian Parliament and its policy objective is to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members by providing a robust system of supervision and enforcement. In the case of Chetan Deviya, the Commissioner of Taxation, through a delegate, has disqualified him from being a responsible officer of a superannuation entity due to the contravention of the SISA by the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities while he was in that role. This disqualification aims to uphold the standards and integrity of the superannuation industry and protect the interests of fund members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to the individuals and entities involved in the supervision and management of superannuation funds in Australia. Specifically, the Act applies to corporate trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, as well as to responsible officers of these entities. The Act's jurisdictional reach is national, as it is a Commonwealth Act, meaning it applies across all states and territories of Australia. The disqualification notice issued to Chetan Deviya, as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee who contravened the SISA, demonstrates the Act's application to persons who are directly involved in the management and administration of superannuation funds. The Act includes provisions for exclusions and exemptions, as well as mechanisms for the revocation of disqualifications and avenues for reconsideration of decisions by the Commissioner. The Act’s application can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, which allows for the inclusion of specific details or further clarifications on the disqualification process and its implications.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains provisions for the disqualification of individuals from participating in the management of superannuation entities. Section 126A(2) allows for the disqualification of a responsible officer of a corporate trustee if the corporate trustee has contravened the SISA. In this instance, Chetan Deviya has been disqualified under subsection 126A(6) because the corporate trustee they were responsible for contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and the nature of these contraventions justifies the disqualification. This disqualification takes effect immediately upon issuance of the notice, as stated in the notice dated 6 July 2022.
The Act imposes several obligations on Chetan Deviya and the corporate trustee they were associated with. As a responsible officer, Chetan Deviya was required to ensure compliance with the SISA. Failure to uphold these obligations, through the contraventions committed by the corporate trustee, led to his disqualification. The Act also mandates that details of the disqualification be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, as outlined in subsection 126A(7). This ensures transparency and public awareness of the disqualification.
Breaching the disqualification provisions of the SISA is a serious matter with significant legal consequences. Section 126K stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or part of a body corporate that holds such roles. This offence carries a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. Such stringent penalties underscore the importance of compliance with the Act’s disqualification provisions. The Act also allows for the revocation of the disqualification under subsection 126A(5), either on the initiative of the Commissioner of Taxation or following a written application by the disqualified person.
For Chetan Deviya, if he is dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, he has the right to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, as per section 344 of the SISA. This reconsideration process requires a written submission outlining the reasons for dissatisfaction. This provision ensures that affected individuals have an avenue for seeking redress and potentially overturning the disqualification if they can demonstrate valid grounds for reconsideration.