NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Cecily Jonanne Maree James
WEST END QLD 4101
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the nature and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 13 September 2016
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Michael Lazzaroni
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address the need for stringent regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry. This Act was introduced to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that the management and administration of these funds are conducted in a manner that upholds the highest standards of integrity and accountability. The overarching policy objective of the SISA is to maintain public confidence in the superannuation system by providing a robust regulatory framework that deters misconduct and enforces compliance among industry participants. Through provisions such as the ability to disqualify individuals who contravene the Act, the legislation aims to prevent unfit persons from participating in the management of superannuation funds, thereby protecting the financial well-being of fund members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation funds within Australia, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The Act operates on a national level, covering the entire Commonwealth of Australia. It aims to ensure that superannuation entities are managed with integrity and to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act explicitly prohibits disqualified individuals from assuming roles that involve the management or oversight of superannuation entities. This prohibition is intended to prevent individuals who have engaged in serious misconduct from continuing to influence the financial wellbeing of superannuation fund members. The Act provides for the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals based on the nature and seriousness of their contraventions. Once disqualified, a person cannot act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. Failure to comply with this prohibition can result in criminal penalties, including up to two years imprisonment. The disqualification may be revoked by the Commissioner of Taxation either on their own initiative or in response to a written application from the disqualified person. Furthermore, individuals who are dissatisfied with the decision to disqualify them have the right to request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes various provisions for the supervision and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. Under subsection 126A(6) of the Act, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation can disqualify an individual from managing or participating in the administration of a superannuation entity if they are satisfied that the person has contravened the Act. In this particular case, Cecily Jonanne Maree James has been disqualified by James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, on the basis of subsection 126A(1) of the SISA due to multiple contraventions of the Act (subsection 126A(6)).
The disqualification requires Cecily to refrain from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or being responsible for a body corporate that holds such roles. Furthermore, the disqualification notice mandates that the details of the disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, as stipulated by subsection 126A(7) of the SISA. The disqualification takes immediate effect from the date of the notice, which in this instance is 13 September 2016.
For individuals like Cecily, who have been disqualified under the SISA, there are significant obligations and requirements. Under section 126K of the Act, it is an offence for a disqualified person who is aware of their disqualification status to continue to be or act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be responsible for such roles within a body corporate. The penalties for contravening this provision are severe, with a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. Additionally, Cecily has the right to request a reconsideration of the disqualification decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, as outlined in section 344 of the SISA. Any such request must be made in writing and should detail the reasons why the decision is considered incorrect.