NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Catherine Moore
CRONULLA NSW 2230
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 30 July 2020
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per John Macuz
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to address the need for robust oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry in Australia. The Act was introduced to ensure that superannuation trustees and related entities operate in a manner that is consistent with the best interests of the superannuation members. This was necessary to protect the retirement savings of Australians and maintain public confidence in the superannuation system. The Act was passed by the Parliament of Australia with the policy objective of ensuring that the superannuation industry is transparent, accountable, and operates with integrity. In the case of Catherine Moore, the Act was used to disqualify her from acting as a trustee or responsible officer of a superannuation entity due to serious breaches of the Act by the corporate trustee she was associated with, highlighting the Act's role in maintaining high standards of conduct within the superannuation sector.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation entities within Australia. The act primarily targets responsible officers, trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation funds, including corporate trustees. The geographic reach of the act is nationwide, operating under the Commonwealth jurisdiction to ensure consistent regulation across all states and territories. The act imposes significant responsibilities on those managing superannuation funds, ensuring they adhere to stringent standards to protect the interests of superannuation members. The act includes provisions for disqualification of individuals from participating in the superannuation industry if they are found to have contravened its provisions while serving as responsible officers. Exclusions and exemptions are limited, with the act generally applying broadly to all relevant persons and entities unless otherwise specified. The act may also be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, allowing for flexibility in enforcement and regulation. The seriousness of contraventions, as demonstrated in the case of Catherine Moore, can lead to immediate disqualification with potential criminal penalties for continued involvement in superannuation management.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides for the disqualification of responsible officers of corporate trustees who engage in serious misconduct. Under section 126A(2) of the SISA, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, such as James O'Halloran, can disqualify a responsible officer if they are satisfied that the corporate trustee has contravened the SISA and the contraventions are serious enough to warrant such a measure. Section 126A(6) requires the delegate to notify the disqualified person in writing, as demonstrated in the notice to Catherine Moore. The disqualification is effective from the date of the notice, as stated in the document.
The obligations imposed by the SISA on the parties it governs are stringent, especially for responsible officers of corporate trustees. They must ensure compliance with the SISA to avoid personal disqualification. Section 126K of the SISA outlines the specific obligations and responsibilities of these officers, emphasising the need for adherence to the law to maintain their eligibility to act in their capacity. The seriousness of any contraventions by the corporate trustee directly impacts the responsible officer, highlighting the importance of oversight and governance within superannuation entities.
Failing to comply with the SISA can have serious consequences, as detailed in the notice. Section 126K stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. The maximum penalty for such an offence is two years in jail, underscoring the gravity of the legislation. This legal framework is designed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members and to enforce accountability within the industry.
Further, section 126A(5) of the SISA provides for the possibility of revoking a disqualification either on the initiative of the delegate or upon a written application by the disqualified person. This provision offers a pathway for rehabilitation and potential reinstatement for those who can demonstrate compliance and rectify any past misconduct. Additionally, section 344 allows for the reconsideration of the disqualification decision by the Commissioner if the affected party submits a written request within 21 days of receiving the notice, providing an opportunity for review and potential rectification of any perceived injustices.