NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - CAMERON PHILLIP SMITH - 19 January 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
CAMERON PHILLIP SMITH
MORLEY WA 6062
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 19 January 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jaq McDougall
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to establish a regulatory framework aimed at ensuring the proper management and supervision of superannuation entities in Australia. This legislation was introduced to address the gap in oversight and protection of superannuation funds, which are critical for the financial security of many Australians. The SISA empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to enforce standards and discipline within the superannuation industry, ensuring that trustees and other responsible officers act in the best interests of fund members. The policy objective behind the SISA is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system by preventing misconduct and ensuring compliance with legislative standards. This is achieved through mechanisms such as the disqualification of individuals who are found to have breached the Act, as seen in the case of Cameron Phillip Smith, who has been disqualified under subsection 126A(2) due to the contravention of the SISA by the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration of superannuation funds, particularly those acting as trustees, investment managers, custodians, or responsible officers. This legislation has a national jurisdictional reach, administered by the Commonwealth of Australia. The Act encompasses a broad range of conduct and transactions related to superannuation entities, ensuring compliance with financial and regulatory standards to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The SISA extends its application through subordinate instruments, which may further detail specific requirements or exemptions as necessary. Notably, the Act provides mechanisms for disqualifying individuals like Cameron Phillip Smith who have contravened its provisions, as evidenced by the notice of disqualification issued under the authority of the Commissioner of Taxation. The geographic and jurisdictional scope of the Act ensures a unified regulatory framework across Australia, with exclusions or exemptions specified within the Act or through its subordinate instruments. Disqualified individuals face severe penalties, including potential imprisonment, for continuing to act in roles that breach the Act's stipulations.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) in this context are sections 126A and 126K. Section 126A(2) provides the authority for the disqualification of an individual if the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA, and the individual was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions. The disqualification is triggered by the seriousness of the contraventions, which provides sufficient grounds for the disqualification. Section 126K sets out the offence of a disqualified person acting as a trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity or being a responsible officer of a corporate trustee, with a maximum penalty of two years in jail.
The Act imposes certain obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. For instance, responsible officers of corporate trustees must ensure that the corporate trustee complies with the provisions of the SISA. This includes maintaining proper records, adhering to investment guidelines, and ensuring the proper management of superannuation funds. Failure to comply with these obligations can lead to serious consequences, including disqualification as seen in this case. Additionally, the Act mandates the publication of disqualification notices, such as the one issued to Cameron Phillip Smith, to inform the public and maintain transparency within the superannuation industry.
The SISA also includes provisions for the consequences of breaches. Section 126K specifically states that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment, highlighting the seriousness with which the Act regards such breaches. This stringent penalty is intended to deter individuals from engaging in activities that could compromise the integrity of the superannuation industry.
In the case of Cameron Phillip Smith, the disqualification takes immediate effect on the date of the notice, which was 19 January 2024. This means that he is immediately barred from any involvement in the management or administration of superannuation funds. Furthermore, section 126A(5) of the SISA provides that the disqualification may be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified individual. This offers a potential pathway for Cameron Phillip Smith to have his disqualification reconsidered under certain conditions.
Lastly, section 344 of the SISA allows for a reconsideration of the disqualification decision by the Commissioner if Cameron Phillip Smith is dissatisfied with the outcome. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and must detail the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect. This provision ensures that affected individuals have a formal mechanism to challenge decisions that they believe are unjust or erroneous, providing a level of procedural fairness within the legislative framework.