NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Bronwyn Tyrell - 30 March 2026
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Bronwyn Tyrell
Springdale Heights NSW 2641
I, Ben Kelly, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 30 March 2026
Ben Kelly
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Olena Newman
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a notifiable instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to address the need for robust regulation and oversight of the superannuation industry in Australia. The Act was introduced to fill a critical gap in the regulation of superannuation trustees and related entities to ensure the protection of superannuation benefits and to maintain the integrity of the superannuation system. The policy objective of the Act is to safeguard the interests of superannuation fund members by imposing strict regulatory requirements on trustees, investment managers, and other entities involved in the management of superannuation funds. This includes the power to disqualify individuals from participating in the administration of superannuation funds if they are found to have contravened the provisions of the Act in a manner that warrants such action. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to delegate the authority to make such disqualification decisions, as evidenced in the notice to Bronwyn Tyrell, thereby ensuring that the administration of the Act is both efficient and effective.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and administration of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers. This Commonwealth legislation has a national reach, impacting all superannuation entities operating within Australia. The Act includes provisions for disqualifying individuals who contravene its stipulations, such as the one applied to Bronwyn Tyrell, a resident of Springdale Heights, NSW. The disqualification restricts the individual from acting in specific roles within the superannuation industry, with serious legal consequences for non-compliance, including potential imprisonment. The Act also provides avenues for review and potential revocation of disqualifications, ensuring there are procedural protections for those affected. Additionally, the Act mandates that details of such disqualifications be published in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and public accountability.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification issued under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs Bronwyn Tyrell that she has been disqualified from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity. This disqualification was made effective immediately upon issuance, as detailed in subsection 126A(1) of the SISA. The notice specifies that the decision was made because Bronwyn Tyrell has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, with the seriousness of these contraventions warranting such a measure. According to subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, the details of this disqualification will be published as a notifiable instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and public disclosure of the decision.
The SISA imposes certain obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. For instance, section 126K of the SISA mandates that any person who has been disqualified under the Act must not act in the specified roles within a superannuation entity. This includes serving as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of such entities. Additionally, disqualified individuals are prohibited from being responsible officers or representatives of bodies corporate that manage superannuation entities. Failure to comply with these provisions can result in significant legal consequences. The act also provides for the revocation of the disqualification under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, which can occur either on the initiative of the Commissioner of Taxation or upon the written application of the disqualified person.
The SISA outlines serious penalties for breaches of its provisions. Specifically, section 126K imposes criminal penalties for a disqualified person knowingly acting in the prohibited roles. Such conduct constitutes an offence under the Act, with the maximum penalty being imprisonment for up to two years. This underscores the importance of adhering to the Act’s stipulations and the severe consequences of non-compliance. Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA provides a recourse for individuals affected by a disqualification decision. If a person believes the decision is incorrect, they can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice, providing reasons for their dissatisfaction. This mechanism ensures that individuals have an opportunity to challenge the decision if they believe it to be unjust or erroneous.