NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – BRENDAN JOHN MORTIMER - 14 February 2025
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Brendan John Mortimer
Gunnedah NSW 2380
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 14 February 2025
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jaq McDougall
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to establish a regulatory framework governing the operations of superannuation entities in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring proper management and investment practices. The Act was introduced to address the need for oversight and regulation in the superannuation industry to prevent misconduct and financial mismanagement. The SISA was enacted by the Australian Parliament, reflecting a policy objective to safeguard the financial well-being of superannuation fund members through stringent regulatory measures. The act includes provisions for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened its provisions, as evidenced by the notice of disqualification issued to Brendan John Mortimer, highlighting the seriousness with which the legislation treats breaches of its regulations.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration, management, or operation of superannuation funds, impacting a broad spectrum of entities such as trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers within the superannuation industry. The Act's jurisdictional reach is national, extending across the Commonwealth of Australia and thereby affecting superannuation entities operating in all states and territories. The Act's application is triggered by contraventions of its provisions, which can lead to disqualification of individuals from participating in the superannuation industry, as seen in the case of Brendan John Mortimer. The disqualification is a punitive measure applied when the contraventions are deemed serious enough to warrant such action. Notably, the Act also provides for the revocation of disqualifications under certain conditions, including upon the initiative of the Commissioner or following a written application by the disqualified person. Furthermore, the Act outlines specific exclusions and penalties, such as the prohibition on disqualified persons acting in roles such as trustees or investment managers, with potential criminal penalties of up to two years in jail for violations.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) outlines the key provisions that govern the disqualification of individuals from participating in superannuation entities. Under subsection 126A(1), a person can be disqualified if there are grounds to believe they have contravened the Act, and the seriousness of such contraventions justifies the disqualification. This was the basis for the notice issued to Brendan John Mortimer, as evidenced in the Notice of Disqualification dated 14 February 2025. The disqualification takes immediate effect upon issuance, as stated in subsection 126A(6).
The Act imposes specific obligations on individuals like Brendan Mortimer who are found to have contravened its provisions. For instance, under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, responsible officer, or body corporate of a superannuation entity if they are aware of their disqualification. This requirement is pivotal in ensuring that disqualified individuals do not continue to engage in activities that could potentially harm the superannuation industry or its beneficiaries.
Breaching these obligations can lead to severe consequences. The Act stipulates that knowingly acting in any of the roles mentioned under section 126K while disqualified is a criminal offence. The maximum penalty for such an offence is two years imprisonment, underscoring the seriousness of the Act's provisions. This punitive measure is designed to deter disqualified individuals from continuing their involvement in the superannuation sector.
Additionally, the Act provides mechanisms for the disqualification to be reviewed or revoked. Under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the authorities or following a written application by the disqualified individual. This offers a pathway for Brendan Mortimer to potentially have his disqualification reconsidered if he believes there are grounds for revocation. Furthermore, section 344 allows for the Commissioner to reconsider the decision if the disqualified person is dissatisfied with the outcome. Such reconsideration requests must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice, providing a structured process for appeal.