NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Billy Kohl - 16 September 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Billy Kohl
Pomonal VIC 3381
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you aren’t a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 16 September 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Pamela Vincent
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for effective regulation and oversight of superannuation funds in Australia. The Act aims to ensure that trustees and responsible officers of superannuation entities are fit and proper persons, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. The Parliament of Australia established this legislative framework to safeguard the integrity and stability of the superannuation system. The policy objective of the SISA is to maintain high standards of conduct and accountability within the superannuation industry, ensuring that trustees and responsible officers act in the best interests of fund members. In the case of Billy Kohl, the Act has been used to disqualify him from acting as a trustee or responsible officer of a superannuation entity due to concerns regarding his fitness and propriety. This action is taken under the authority granted by the SISA to ensure that only individuals who meet the required standards are entrusted with managing superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration and management of superannuation funds, including trustees and responsible officers of bodies corporate that manage superannuation entities. The Act has a national reach, governing superannuation industry conduct across Australia at the Commonwealth level. It specifically targets those deemed unfit to manage superannuation funds due to their conduct or character, as evidenced by the disqualification notice issued to Billy Kohl. The Act stipulates that disqualified individuals cannot act as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities, with potential penalties including up to two years in jail. The disqualification can be revoked by the Commissioner of Taxation either on their own initiative or upon application by the disqualified person. The notice of disqualification is published as a notifiable instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and public awareness of such decisions.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes specific provisions for disqualifying individuals deemed unfit to serve as trustees or responsible officers of superannuation entities. Under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation can formally disqualify an individual, as evidenced by the notice to Billy Kohl dated 16 September 2024. This disqualification occurs when the delegate is satisfied that the individual is not a fit and proper person to hold such a position, which is outlined in subsection 126A(3) of the SISA. The disqualification is effective from the date the notice is issued.
The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. Trustees and responsible officers must meet specific standards of fitness and propriety to maintain their positions. The SISA also mandates that any disqualification notices, such as the one issued to Billy Kohl, must be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation, as per subsection 126A(7). Additionally, the Act stipulates that if an individual is disqualified, they must not act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity, as outlined in section 126K of the SISA.
Failure to comply with these provisions can result in severe consequences. Section 126K of the SISA criminalises the act of a disqualified person knowingly continuing to serve in a prohibited capacity. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years in jail. This stringent penalty underscores the importance of adhering to the Act’s requirements. Furthermore, the Act provides avenues for individuals to seek reconsideration of their disqualification. Under section 344 of the SISA, an affected individual can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, provided that the request is made in writing and includes reasons for the reconsideration.
In addition to the potential criminal penalties, the SISA also offers a mechanism for the revocation of a disqualification. As per subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification may be revoked either by the delegate on their own initiative or upon a written application from the disqualified individual. This provision allows for flexibility and the possibility of reinstatement under certain conditions, provided that the individual can demonstrate a change in circumstances that justifies such a revocation.