NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Betre Weldeyes – 16 January 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Betre Weldeyes
FLEMINGTON VIC 3031
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 16 January 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Karen Taylor
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation..
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to regulate and supervise the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring the proper management and administration of their funds. The Act was introduced to address the need for stringent oversight and accountability within the superannuation sector, particularly in light of the significant trust placed by members in the entities managing their retirement savings. Enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament, the policy objective of the Act is to safeguard the integrity and financial stability of the superannuation industry. This legislative framework provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals from being involved in the management of superannuation entities if they are found to have contravened the provisions of the Act, thereby ensuring that only qualified and responsible individuals manage superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to the conduct of trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities within the Commonwealth of Australia. This includes individuals and corporate trustees involved in the management of superannuation funds. The Act aims to ensure the proper administration and supervision of superannuation entities, thereby protecting the interests of members and beneficiaries. The Act’s jurisdictional reach is national, applying across all states and territories of Australia, and it extends to any conduct or transactions involving superannuation entities. Notably, the Act does not specify particular exclusions or exemptions, meaning its broad scope applies comprehensively to those within its purview. However, the Act may extend or restrict its application through subordinate instruments, which could further define specific areas of operation or carve out exceptions as necessary.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains various provisions related to the supervision of the superannuation industry, with section 126A being particularly relevant in this context. Under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA, a person can be disqualified from acting in certain capacities if the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the Act on one or more occasions and the person was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions. Subsection 126A(6) requires that a notice of disqualification be given to the individual, as seen in the notice to Betre Weldeyes dated 16 January 2024. This disqualification takes immediate effect upon its issuance.
The obligations imposed by the Act on parties, particularly those in responsible officer roles, are significant. They are expected to ensure compliance with the SISA and avoid any actions that might lead to contraventions. In the case of Betre Weldeyes, the seriousness of the contraventions, combined with the fact that they were a responsible officer, provided sufficient grounds for their disqualification. This demonstrates the importance of maintaining high standards of conduct and adherence to the regulatory framework set by the SISA.
There are serious consequences for breaches of the Act, particularly under section 126K. An individual who knows they are disqualified and continues to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer, commits an offence. The maximum penalty for such an offence is two years in jail, highlighting the gravity with which the legislation treats non-compliance. Additionally, under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon the written application of the disqualified person. This provides a potential avenue for reinstatement if the disqualified person can demonstrate that the grounds for disqualification no longer apply.
Lastly, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for reconsideration of the disqualification decision. If Betre Weldeyes or any other affected party is dissatisfied with the decision, they can request the Commissioner to reconsider it. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of the decision and must include the reasons for believing the decision to be incorrect. This ensures that there is a process in place for reviewing and potentially rectifying what may be perceived as an unjust decision.