NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Bert Rainer Maass
ESSENDON
VIC 3040
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have made a decision to disqualify you from being, or acting as:
a trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity.
I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification order takes effect on the day on which this notice is made.
Dated: 7 June 2016
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Colleen Shelton
Note 1:
In accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, particulars of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
In accordance with subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on written application made by you.
Note 3:
In accordance with section 344 of the SISA, if you are a person who is affected by this decision and you are dissatisfied with it, you may ask the Commissioner to reconsider this decision. Such a request must be made in writing within 21 days after the day on which you received notice of the decision and must also give the reasons for making the request.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for robust supervision and regulation within the superannuation industry, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members and beneficiaries. The Act was introduced by the Australian Parliament to establish a regulatory framework that ensures the proper administration, management, and operation of superannuation funds. The policy objective of SISA is to maintain high standards of conduct and accountability among those involved in the superannuation industry, thereby fostering trust and confidence in the system. In this context, the Act provides mechanisms for the disqualification of individuals who fail to meet these standards, ensuring that only those who adhere to the prescribed regulations are permitted to manage or oversee superannuation entities.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and management of superannuation funds, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of body corporates that perform such roles. The Act has a national reach, applying across Australia, and encompasses various conduct and transactions related to superannuation entities. The Act may extend or restrict its application through subordinate instruments, providing flexibility in its implementation and enforcement. Exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds are not explicitly stated in this disqualification notice, but the Act generally provides for specific conditions under which certain entities or individuals may be exempt from certain provisions. The decision to disqualify an individual such as Bert Rainer Maass is made under the authority granted by the SISA, reflecting the Commonwealth's commitment to ensuring the integrity and proper management of superannuation funds.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides the legal framework for the oversight of the superannuation industry in Australia. Under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA, the Commissioner of Taxation is empowered to disqualify individuals from acting as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities, or from being responsible officers of entities that manage superannuation funds. In this case, Bert Rainer Maass has been disqualified under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA because the delegate of the Commissioner, James O’Halloran, is satisfied that Mr. Maass has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions to a degree that warrants such a disqualification. The disqualification is effective from the date the notice is issued, which in this instance is 7 June 2016.
The obligations imposed by the SISA on individuals and entities include adherence to the standards set forth in the Act to ensure the proper management and supervision of superannuation funds. Trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers must comply with the regulatory requirements designed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. Failure to comply with these obligations can result in severe consequences, including disqualification from participating in the management of superannuation funds. The notice to Bert Rainer Maass indicates that he has breached these obligations, leading to his immediate disqualification.
The SISA also outlines the penalties and consequences for breaches of its provisions. While the specific section detailing penalties is not mentioned in the notice, it is known that serious contraventions of the SISA can lead to significant penalties. Such penalties may include fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the severity and nature of the breach. The notice does, however, mention avenues for appeal and reconsideration. Bert Rainer Maass, if dissatisfied with the decision, may request the Commissioner to reconsider the disqualification in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice. Additionally, the disqualification can be revoked on the initiative of the Commissioner or following a written application by Mr. Maass.
The notice also informs Bert Rainer Maass that details of the disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette in accordance with subsection 126A(7) of the SISA. This public notice serves as an official record of the disqualification and informs the public and relevant stakeholders of the action taken. Furthermore, the notice clarifies that the disqualification can be revoked by the Commissioner either on their own initiative or upon a written application from Mr. Maass, providing a potential pathway for reinstatement if certain conditions are met. This framework ensures that the disqualification process is both transparent and provides opportunities for rectification and appeal.