NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - Benjamin McCosh
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Benjamin McCosh
SUNSHINE BEACH QLD 4567
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 31 August 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Karen Taylor
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for effective regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring that superannuation funds are managed in the best interests of members. The Act provides a framework for the oversight of trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, with the overarching policy objective of protecting the financial interests of superannuation fund members. In the case of Benjamin McCosh, the Act was used to disqualify him from acting as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee due to the contraventions committed by the corporate trustee while McCosh held his position. This disqualification aims to uphold the integrity and compliance of the superannuation industry. The notice of disqualification, issued by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, informs McCosh that he is disqualified under the provisions of the SISA and outlines the potential legal consequences and avenues for reconsideration or appeal.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and oversight of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers. The Act has a Commonwealth jurisdiction, applying nationally across Australia and regulating the conduct and transactions related to superannuation entities. It imposes stringent requirements on these individuals and entities to ensure the proper management and safeguarding of superannuation funds. The Act also extends its reach through subordinate instruments, which may provide further detail or clarification on the implementation of its provisions. Exclusions and exemptions within the Act are minimal, as its primary focus is on maintaining high standards of conduct and supervision within the superannuation industry. The disqualification of Benjamin McCosh under subsection 126A(2) of the Act exemplifies the seriousness with which the legislation treats breaches, particularly when they involve responsible officers who have contravened the Act.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides mechanisms for the disqualification of individuals who have acted as responsible officers in circumstances where the corporate trustee of a superannuation entity has contravened the Act. Section 126A(2) of the SISA allows for the disqualification of such individuals, and subsection 126A(6) requires the Commissioner of Taxation or a delegate to give notice to the person being disqualified. This notice informs the individual of the decision and the reasons behind it. In this case, Benjamin McCosh has been disqualified by Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, because McCosh was a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that contravened the SISA, and the seriousness of these contraventions warranted his disqualification.
The disqualification imposes strict obligations on the individual concerned. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any capacity that involves being a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of a body corporate that performs these roles. This prohibition is intended to prevent disqualified individuals from continuing to influence or manage superannuation entities, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. Breaching this prohibition can result in criminal liability, including imprisonment for up to two years as outlined in section 126K.
The SISA also provides avenues for the individual to seek recourse if they believe the disqualification was unjust. Under section 344, McCosh has the right to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be in writing and should detail the reasons why McCosh believes the decision is incorrect. Additionally, the SISA allows for the possibility of revoking the disqualification under subsection 126A(5), either on the initiative of the Commissioner or following a written application by McCosh himself. This flexibility ensures that the disqualification can be reviewed and potentially overturned if new information comes to light or if there are valid grounds for reconsideration.
The legislative framework thus balances the need to protect the superannuation industry from irresponsible behaviour with the rights of individuals to seek redress and rehabilitation. By clearly defining the process for disqualification, the obligations it imposes, and the penalties for non-compliance, the SISA aims to maintain the integrity and trust in the superannuation system.