NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Ben Holland
Stanwell Park NSW 2508
I, Susan Russell, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 16 December 2020
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Susan Russell
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to provide a regulatory framework for the supervision of superannuation funds, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring the prudent and ethical management of these funds. The Act was introduced to address the need for oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry, which had grown significantly in importance and size, to safeguard the financial well-being of millions of Australians who relied on these funds for their retirement. The policy objective of the SISA is to maintain and improve the standards of conduct and management within the superannuation industry, ensuring that trustees, investment managers, and custodians act in the best interests of the fund members. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from performing certain roles within the superannuation industry if they are found to have contravened the provisions of the Act in a manner that justifies such a measure.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, encompassing trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. This Act has a national reach, being a Commonwealth statute, and aims to regulate the conduct and operations within the superannuation sector to ensure compliance and protect the interests of superannuation members. The Act provides the Commissioner of Taxation with the authority to disqualify individuals from participating in the superannuation industry if they are found to have contravened the provisions of the Act, particularly when the contraventions are deemed serious enough to warrant such action. This disqualification prohibits the disqualified individual from acting as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity, with the potential for criminal penalties if they continue to engage in such roles post-disqualification. The Act allows for the disqualification to be revoked either upon the initiative of the Commissioner or through a written application by the disqualified person, and also provides for reconsideration of the disqualification decision by the Commissioner if the affected party is dissatisfied with the outcome.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes various provisions for the supervision of the superannuation industry, one of which is the power to disqualify individuals from performing certain roles related to superannuation entities. Section 126A(1) allows the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify an individual from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity if they are satisfied that the individual has contravened the SISA. The disqualification is effective immediately upon issuance, as stated in subsection 126A(6). In the case of Ben Holland, the disqualification notice issued under this section indicates that he has contravened the SISA in a manner that justifies his disqualification.
The SISA imposes specific obligations on disqualified individuals to refrain from acting in the prohibited roles. Section 126K of the Act stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person who is aware of their disqualification status to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or part of a body corporate performing such roles. The potential penalties for violating these provisions include a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment, highlighting the seriousness of the offence.
Additionally, the Act provides mechanisms for review and potential revocation of the disqualification. Under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either by the Commissioner on their own initiative or upon a written application from the disqualified individual. This offers a pathway for reconsideration and potential reinstatement of their eligibility to perform certain roles within the superannuation industry.
For individuals who believe the disqualification decision is unjust, the SISA provides a right to request a reconsideration of the decision. Section 344 of the Act allows an affected individual to ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, provided the request is made in writing and includes the reasons why the decision is considered incorrect. This ensures that there is a formal process in place for individuals to challenge the disqualification and seek redress if they believe it was made in error.