NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Aydin Cetinay
BOSSLEY PARK NSW 2176
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 2 December 2016
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Leanne Mclean
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Australian Parliament to address significant gaps in the regulation and oversight of the superannuation industry, ensuring that superannuation entities operate in a manner that protects the interests of members. The SISA provides a comprehensive framework for the regulation of superannuation funds, aiming to maintain confidence in the superannuation system and ensure the proper management of superannuation assets. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from participating in the administration of superannuation entities if they have contravened the Act, with the seriousness of the contravention providing grounds for such action. This legislative measure aims to safeguard the integrity and stability of the superannuation system, preventing unfit individuals from managing funds that are critical for Australians' retirement security.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management of superannuation funds, particularly targeting trustees, investment managers, and custodians within the superannuation industry. This Act has a broad jurisdictional reach, operating under the Commonwealth to ensure the proper administration and supervision of superannuation entities. The Act extends its application to any person or body corporate that is involved in managing, investing, or holding funds for superannuation entities. The notice of disqualification under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA, as exemplified in the case of Mr Aydin Cetinay, is a mechanism to enforce compliance and deter serious misconduct by prohibiting disqualified individuals from participating in the management of superannuation funds. Additionally, the Act provides for the revocation of disqualification and allows for reconsideration of decisions by the Commissioner, ensuring a balance between enforcement and due process. The geographic scope of the Act is national, as it is a Commonwealth Act, meaning it applies across all states and territories of Australia. The Act does not explicitly mention exclusions or thresholds but focuses on disqualifying individuals based on the seriousness of their contraventions.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) pertinent to this notice include subsection 126A(6) which mandates the provision of a disqualification notice to the affected individual, and subsection 126A(1) which allows for the disqualification of a person if there is satisfaction that they have contravened the SISA seriously enough to warrant such action. The notice itself, provided by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, informs Mr Aydin Cetinay that he has been disqualified under the authority granted by the SISA. This disqualification takes effect immediately upon issuance of the notice.
The Act imposes certain obligations and requirements on Mr Cetinay and other entities it governs. Specifically, section 126K of the SISA prohibits a disqualified person from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or from being a responsible officer or a body corporate that holds such roles. This prohibition is designed to protect the integrity and proper management of superannuation entities. The Act also requires that any disqualified person refrains from engaging in activities that would make them liable under these roles.
Failure to comply with the provisions of the SISA can result in serious consequences. Under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any capacity mentioned, and the maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment. This highlights the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches of its provisions. Additionally, the Act allows for the disqualification to be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person, as stipulated in subsection 126A(5).
If Mr Cetinay is dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, he has the right to request a reconsideration by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be made in writing and must outline the reasons why the decision is believed to be incorrect, as per section 344 of the SISA. This provision ensures that there is a formal process in place for addressing grievances and potentially rectifying errors or misunderstandings in the disqualification decision.