NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Asshur Kanna
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Asshur Kanna
WEST HOXTON NSW 2171
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 3 December 2021
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per John Macuz
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Australian Parliament to address the need for the effective and responsible supervision of the superannuation industry, thereby protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act was introduced to ensure that the superannuation system operates efficiently and in the best interest of the participants, by regulating the conduct of trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. The policy objective of the SISA is to maintain and enhance the integrity, efficiency, and effectiveness of the superannuation industry, ensuring that members’ interests are safeguarded. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from participating in the superannuation industry if they are found to have contravened the provisions of the SISA in a manner that warrants such a sanction. This legislative framework is crucial for maintaining public confidence in the superannuation system and ensuring its long-term sustainability.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management of superannuation funds within Australia. Specifically, it encompasses trustees, investment managers, custodians, responsible officers, and bodies corporate that are trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities. The Act’s jurisdiction extends across the Commonwealth of Australia, thereby applying to all states and territories. The legislation provides a framework to ensure the proper administration and supervision of superannuation funds, safeguarding the interests of members. The Act may disqualify individuals found to have contravened its provisions, with the disqualification barring them from acting in the specified roles within superannuation entities. Notably, the Act allows for the revocation of such disqualifications under certain conditions, offering a pathway for reinstatement following written application or at the discretion of the Commissioner. Furthermore, individuals dissatisfied with the disqualification decision can request a reconsideration within 21 days of receiving the notice.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) in this context include subsection 126A(1) (which empowers the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify a person from participating in the superannuation industry), subsection 126A(6) (which mandates the giving of a written notice of disqualification), and subsection 126A(7) (which requires the publication of disqualification details in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette). Asshur Kanna has been disqualified under these provisions due to contraventions of the SISA.
This Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. Primarily, it requires Asshur Kanna, as a participant in the superannuation industry, to comply with all provisions of the SISA. This includes adherence to the ethical and professional standards set forth to ensure the integrity and protection of superannuation funds. The disqualification serves as a direct consequence of failing to meet these obligations, highlighting the importance of compliance.
Under section 126K of the SISA, any disqualified person who knowingly acts as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer or body corporate in such roles, commits an offence. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years in jail, illustrating the seriousness with which the Act treats breaches of its provisions. This legal framework aims to deter misconduct and protect superannuation fund beneficiaries by ensuring that only qualified and trustworthy individuals manage these funds.
Additionally, subsection 126A(5) of the SISA provides for the possibility of revoking a disqualification either on the initiative of the delegate or upon a written application by the disqualified person. This flexibility allows for reconsideration and potential reinstatement if the disqualifying circumstances change or if the individual demonstrates compliance and rehabilitation. Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA offers a mechanism for Asshur Kanna to seek reconsideration of the disqualification decision by the Commissioner, provided the request is made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and includes the reasons for dissatisfaction with the decision. This ensures that individuals have a pathway to challenge and potentially overturn a disqualification if they believe it was unjust.