NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To: Mr Ashley Florance
UPPER LOCKYER QLD 4350
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 17 June 2020
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Nello Di Salle
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address the need for better regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry, ensuring that trustees, investment managers, custodians, and other entities handle superannuation funds responsibly and ethically. This legislation was introduced to fill a significant gap in the oversight of the superannuation sector, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by preventing misconduct and ensuring that those who manage these funds do so with integrity. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain high standards of conduct within the superannuation industry, thereby safeguarding the retirement savings of Australians. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals from participating in the superannuation industry if they have contravened the provisions of the Act, as illustrated by the disqualification notice issued to Mr. Ashley Florance under subsection 126A(1) of the Act.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, including trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. The Act has a Commonwealth reach and applies across Australia, as it is a national piece of legislation. The Act's application may be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, which can provide further clarification or detail regarding its provisions. In this instance, the Act is being applied to Mr. Ashley Florance, who has been disqualified from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity due to contraventions of the Act. The disqualification is in effect immediately and details of the disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette. The Act also stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to continue acting in any capacity within the superannuation industry, with a maximum penalty of two years in jail. The disqualification can be revoked either by the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation or upon written application by the disqualified person. If Mr. Florance is unsatisfied with the decision, he has the right to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, providing reasons for his dissatisfaction.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes provisions that allow for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened the Act, as outlined in subsection 126A(1). In this case, Mr. Ashley Florance has been disqualified under subsection 126A(6) by James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, who is satisfied that Mr. Florance has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions justifies the disqualification. The disqualification takes immediate effect as per the notice issued on 17 June 2020. Further, as per subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, the details of this disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Under the SISA, the disqualification imposes significant obligations on the disqualified individual, particularly under section 126K. It is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or part of a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of such an entity. The seriousness of this offence is underscored by the potential penalty, which includes up to two years of imprisonment, indicating the critical nature of compliance with the Act's provisions.
Moreover, the disqualification can be revoked under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, either on the initiative of the authorities or upon a written application by the disqualified individual. This flexibility allows for the possibility of reinstatement if the grounds for disqualification are no longer applicable. Additionally, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for Mr. Florance to request a reconsideration of the decision if he is dissatisfied with the disqualification. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of the decision and should include the reasons why the decision is considered incorrect. This ensures that Mr. Florance has a formal avenue to challenge the decision if he believes it to be unjust or based on incorrect information.