NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Artin Georgis - 20 November 2024
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Artin Georgis
Middleton Grange NSW 2171
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsections 126A(1) and 126A(3) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you aren’t a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 20 November 2024
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Susan Russell
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted to regulate the superannuation industry in Australia, aiming to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that trustees and responsible officers act in a manner that maintains the integrity and stability of the industry. The Act was introduced by the Parliament of Australia to address the need for stricter oversight and regulation of superannuation entities to safeguard members' benefits and maintain public confidence in the system. The primary policy objective of the Act is to ensure that trustees and responsible officers are fit and proper persons, thereby preventing misconduct and mismanagement within the superannuation sector. The Act provides mechanisms for disqualifying individuals who fail to meet these standards, ensuring that only those who uphold the highest standards of conduct are entrusted with managing superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and oversight of superannuation funds within Australia. Specifically, it targets trustees and responsible officers of bodies corporate that function as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities. The Act’s jurisdiction extends across the Commonwealth of Australia, enforcing standards of conduct and fitness for those involved in superannuation activities. The Act provides for the disqualification of individuals deemed unfit to manage such entities due to serious contraventions, with penalties including imprisonment for continued involvement in prohibited roles after disqualification. The Act also allows for the revocation of disqualifications under certain conditions and provides a pathway for reconsideration of disqualification decisions by affected parties. Exclusions or exemptions from the Act’s application are not specified in the provided notice, suggesting that the provisions apply broadly within its jurisdictional scope.
Key Provisions
The key operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) in this context are sections 126A and 126K. Section 126A(1) and (3) allow for the disqualification of an individual from being a trustee or a responsible officer of a superannuation entity if they are not deemed fit and proper to hold such positions. Section 126A(6) mandates that a notice of disqualification must be provided to the individual, specifying the reasons for the disqualification. Section 126K then stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any capacity related to a superannuation entity, such as trustee, investment manager, or custodian, and prescribes a penalty of up to two years imprisonment for such an offence.
The obligations and requirements imposed by the Act on the parties it governs are primarily centred around the maintenance of professional and ethical standards within the superannuation industry. Trustees and responsible officers must adhere to the provisions that ensure they are fit and proper persons. This includes acting in the best interests of the superannuation fund members, maintaining appropriate levels of competence and integrity, and avoiding conflicts of interest. The Act also mandates that any breaches of these standards can result in disqualification, and it requires that such decisions be communicated formally and transparently to the affected parties.
In terms of the consequences for breach of the Act, there are significant civil and criminal penalties. Specifically, under section 126K, any disqualified person who knowingly acts in a capacity that they are prohibited from, such as being a trustee or responsible officer, commits an offence. The maximum penalty for this offence is a two-year imprisonment term. Additionally, the disqualification itself is a severe restriction, preventing the individual from participating in any capacity related to the administration of superannuation entities, thereby safeguarding the interests of fund members.
The Act provides mechanisms for potential recourse in cases where an individual feels the disqualification decision is unjust. Under section 344, a disqualified person can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice. This reconsideration process allows for a formal review of the decision, providing an opportunity to present arguments and evidence that might alter the Commissioner’s initial determination. Furthermore, under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon the written application of the disqualified individual, offering a path to reinstatement under certain conditions.