NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - AROORAN MANICKAVASAGAR
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
AROORAN MANICKAVASAGAR
TOONGABBIE NSW 2146
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the number and seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 13 September 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Susan Russell
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Australian Parliament to regulate the operations of superannuation entities, ensuring that trustees and other responsible officers manage funds in the best interests of the members. This Act was introduced to address the need for stringent oversight and accountability within the superannuation industry, particularly in light of past instances where trustees and officers failed to act in the best interests of fund members. The policy objective of the SISA is to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that the industry is managed with integrity, competence, and transparency. The Act provides mechanisms for the disqualification of individuals who are deemed unfit to manage superannuation funds due to repeated or serious breaches of the law. This legislative framework aims to maintain the financial security and trust of the superannuation system, which is a cornerstone of retirement income for many Australians.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and corporate trustees involved in the administration of superannuation entities, which includes entities such as funds, schemes, and accounts that hold superannuation benefits for individuals. The Act specifically targets responsible officers of corporate trustees who have engaged in contraventions of the Act, with the disqualification mechanism being a significant enforcement tool. The Act operates on a national level, applying across Australia, and its provisions extend to any person or entity involved in the management of superannuation funds. Exclusions from the Act's application are not explicitly detailed in the notice, but it is clear that the disqualification applies to individuals who have been found to be responsible officers during periods of contraventions by their respective corporate trustees. Additionally, the Act's application may be extended or clarified through subordinate instruments, which provide further detail on the specific contraventions and the circumstances under which disqualification may occur.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains several critical provisions, with sections 126A and 126K being particularly relevant to the disqualification notice issued to Arooran Manickavasagar. Section 126A(2) empowers a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify an individual from being a responsible officer of a corporate trustee if the individual is found to be complicit in contraventions of the SISA. This disqualification is triggered when the delegate is satisfied that the contraventions are both numerous and serious. Section 126A(6) mandates that a formal notice of disqualification must be issued to the individual, as seen in the notice to Arooran Manickavasagar dated 13 September 2023.
The Act imposes several obligations on parties and entities it governs. For instance, responsible officers of corporate trustees must ensure compliance with the SISA to avoid personal disqualification. Furthermore, section 126K of the SISA places a responsibility on disqualified individuals to refrain from acting or being appointed as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer of such entities. Failure to comply with this prohibition can lead to severe legal consequences.
Breaching the provisions of the SISA can lead to significant penalties. Section 126K stipulates that it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any capacity that they have been prohibited from, with the maximum penalty being two years imprisonment. Additionally, the disqualification notice issued under section 126A(7) will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, serving as a public record of the disqualification. This public notice acts as both a deterrent and a means of informing the public about individuals who have been found in breach of the SISA.
In terms of seeking redress, section 344 of the SISA allows a disqualified individual to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision if they believe it to be incorrect. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice of disqualification and should include the reasons why the decision is considered wrong. Moreover, section 126A(5) provides for the possibility of revoking the disqualification either on the initiative of the delegate or upon a written application from the disqualified individual, offering a potential avenue for reinstatement under certain conditions.