NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Arnel Montarde - 16 December 2025
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Arnel Montarde
Marsden Park NSW 2765
I, Ben Kelly, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 16 December 2025
Ben Kelly
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Debbi Smith
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate the superannuation industry in Australia, addressing the need for oversight and accountability in the management of superannuation funds. This Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to oversee and supervise the conduct of trustees, investment managers, and custodians within the superannuation industry. The policy objective is to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by ensuring that those involved in managing these funds adhere to stringent standards of conduct and compliance. In the case of Arnel Montarde, a notice of disqualification has been issued under the authority granted by the SISA, reflecting the seriousness of the contraventions identified and the need to uphold the integrity of the superannuation system. This legislative framework aims to prevent misconduct and maintain trust in the superannuation industry, ultimately safeguarding the financial well-being of superannuation fund members.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. Its jurisdiction extends across Australia, and it is administered at the Commonwealth level. The Act includes provisions for disqualifying individuals who contravene its requirements, which may include breaches of fiduciary duties, improper investments, or failure to comply with regulatory standards. The disqualification can be imposed by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation and is communicated through a formal notice to the affected person. This notice becomes effective on the date it is issued, and details of the disqualification are published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation. The Act also imposes penalties, including potential imprisonment, for disqualified individuals who continue to act in prohibited capacities. Additionally, the Commissioner has the authority to revoke the disqualification under certain conditions, and affected individuals have the right to request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains several key provisions that are pertinent to the disqualification of individuals such as Arnel Montarde. Under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, such as Ben Kelly, can issue a notice of disqualification when they are satisfied that the individual has contravened the SISA and the seriousness of the contraventions warrants such action. This notice informs the individual, in this case Arnel Montarde, of their disqualification. The disqualification takes effect immediately upon the issuance of the notice, as stated in the document.
The SISA imposes several obligations and requirements on individuals within the superannuation industry. Notably, section 126K of the Act outlines that it is an offence for a disqualified person, who is aware of their disqualification, to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer or part of a body corporate that holds such roles. This restriction is in place to maintain the integrity of the superannuation industry and protect the interests of superannuation members.
Failing to comply with the disqualification can lead to severe consequences. Under section 126K of the SISA, a disqualified person who continues to act in the prohibited capacities can face criminal charges. The maximum penalty for such an offence is two years imprisonment. This stringent penalty underscores the importance of adhering to the disqualification and the serious nature of the contraventions that led to it.
Additionally, there are mechanisms for potential revocation of the disqualification. According to subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner of Taxation or upon a written application by the disqualified person. This flexibility allows for reconsideration and potential reinstatement, provided the conditions are met. Furthermore, section 344 of the SISA allows for the Commissioner to reconsider a decision if the affected party submits a written request within 21 days of receiving the notice, explaining why they believe the decision is incorrect. This provision ensures that there is a pathway for review and possible rectification of the decision.