NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Antonio Boccamazzo
MT CLARENCE WA 6330
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection126A(3) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you are not a fit and proper person to be a trustee or a responsible officer of a body corporate that is a trustee, of a superannuation entity for the purposes of the SISA.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 11 July 2017
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Debra Goldfinch
Director Superannuation
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to provide for the effective supervision of superannuation entities and to ensure that trustees and responsible officers of superannuation entities are fit and proper persons. The legislation aimed to address issues of financial mismanagement, fraud, and misconduct within the superannuation industry, thus protecting the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who are deemed unfit to hold positions of trust or responsibility within superannuation entities. This legislative action was taken to reinforce the integrity and stability of the superannuation system, safeguarding the retirement savings of Australians.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the administration of superannuation funds within Australia. The Act specifically targets trustees, responsible officers, and other relevant personnel who are responsible for the management and oversight of superannuation entities. This legislation has a national reach, applying across the Commonwealth of Australia, and is enforced by the Commissioner of Taxation. The Act's primary exclusion relates to the scope of who is considered a disqualified person; however, this is not explicitly detailed in the notice. The disqualification process can be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, although the notice does not elaborate on this aspect. In this particular case, Antonio Boccamazzo has been disqualified under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA, based on the determination that he is not a fit and proper person to serve as a trustee or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. This disqualification is effective immediately and carries significant consequences, including potential criminal penalties if the disqualified person continues to act in a prohibited capacity.
Key Provisions
The key provision in the disqualification notice is under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), which mandates that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must inform the disqualified person in writing. In this case, Antonio Boccamazzo is notified by James O'Halloran that he has been disqualified from being a trustee or responsible officer of a superannuation entity due to not being a fit and proper person, as determined under subsection 126A(3) of the SISA. This disqualification is effective from the date of the notice, which in this instance is 11 July 2017. Under subsection 126A(7), details of this disqualification will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the disqualified person and other relevant parties. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person who is aware of their disqualification status to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, or responsible officer of a superannuation entity. This prohibition applies to both individuals and body corporates that are trustees, investment managers, or custodians of such entities. These obligations are crucial in maintaining the integrity and proper governance of superannuation entities.
The Act also sets out serious consequences for breaches of these provisions. Section 126K stipulates that knowingly acting in the roles prohibited by the disqualification notice constitutes an offence. The maximum penalty for this offence, as specified in the notice, is two years imprisonment. This underscores the seriousness with which the law regards the governance and management of superannuation entities. Additionally, under subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person.
For Antonio Boccamazzo, or any other person affected by such a decision, there is a recourse provided under section 344 of the SISA. If dissatisfied with the decision, the affected person can request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision in writing. This request must be made within 21 days of receiving the notice and should include the reasons why the decision is considered wrong. This provision ensures that there is a mechanism for review and potential redress for those who believe the disqualification was unjust.