| Commonwealth of Australia | Gazette |
Published by the Commonwealth of Australia | GOVERNMENT NOTICES |
NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To: Anne Kehoe
DAGLISH WA 6008
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contravention provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 17 May 2019
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Pauline Truong
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address significant deficiencies and misconduct within the superannuation industry. The Act aimed to enhance the regulation and oversight of superannuation entities to ensure the protection of members' interests and the integrity of the superannuation system. It established the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) as the prudential supervisor of the superannuation industry, with powers to regulate, monitor and enforce compliance among superannuation funds. The policy objective of the SISA is to maintain the financial soundness of the superannuation industry, safeguard the interests of superannuation members and beneficiaries, and ensure that trustees and other responsible persons act in the best interests of the members. The Act provides for the disqualification of individuals who have contravened the provisions of the SISA, which helps to deter misconduct and maintain high standards of professional conduct within the industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the management and administration of superannuation funds in Australia. The Act's reach is national, and it applies to trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The Act seeks to protect the interests of superannuation fund members by regulating the conduct and operations of these entities and individuals. The Act includes provisions for disqualification of individuals who contravene its provisions, with the disqualification taking effect immediately upon notice. The notice of disqualification, as evidenced in the provided gazette, is a formal declaration by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation that an individual has contravened the SISA and is subsequently disqualified from performing certain roles within the superannuation industry. The Act also imposes criminal penalties for those who act in a prohibited capacity after being disqualified. The scope of the Act can be further extended or refined through subordinate instruments, allowing for detailed regulation of specific areas within the superannuation industry.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) includes specific provisions for disqualifying individuals who have contravened its requirements. Under section 126A(1), an individual can be disqualified if they have contravened the Act in a manner deemed serious enough to warrant such action. This disqualification can be imposed by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, as stated in section 126A(6). In this case, the delegate has disqualified Anne Kehoe, providing the reasons for the decision, including the belief that she contravened the SISA and the seriousness of such actions.
Those disqualified under the SISA face strict limitations on their involvement with superannuation entities. According to section 126K, it becomes an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of a body corporate that fulfils these roles. This prohibition is designed to prevent individuals who have breached the Act from managing superannuation funds. The potential consequences for such breaches are severe, with the maximum penalty under section 126K being two years imprisonment.
The disqualification under section 126A is not permanent and can be subject to revocation. As per subsection 126A(5), the disqualification can be lifted either by the delegate on their own initiative or in response to a written application from the disqualified person. This process offers a potential path for individuals to regain their eligibility to work within the superannuation industry, provided they can demonstrate compliance and rectify any past issues.
For those affected by a disqualification notice, section 344 of the SISA provides a mechanism for reconsideration. If an individual believes the decision to disqualify them is incorrect, they have the right to request a review from the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice. This request must be made in writing and should detail the reasons why the decision is considered wrong. This provision ensures that individuals have a formal process to challenge decisions that they believe are unjust or based on incorrect information.