NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Annabelle Dean
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
ANNABELLE DEAN
MEEKATHARRA WA 6642
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 23 February 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Donna Williams
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to regulate the superannuation industry, ensuring that superannuation entities are managed responsibly and in the best interests of their members. The Act was introduced to address the need for a robust regulatory framework to oversee the operations of superannuation entities and protect the financial interests of members, particularly in light of the significant role superannuation plays in Australians' retirement planning. The SISA was enacted by the Parliament of Australia, reflecting a policy objective to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation system. In the case of Annabelle Dean, the Act was utilised to disqualify her from acting as a responsible officer of a corporate trustee due to breaches of the SISA, as determined by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation. This legislative measure aims to deter non-compliance and maintain the standards expected within the superannuation industry.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and corporate entities involved in the management of superannuation entities, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers. The Act imposes obligations on these entities and individuals to ensure compliance with the legislative standards designed to protect superannuation funds and beneficiaries. This Commonwealth legislation governs the superannuation industry across Australia, impacting various stakeholders involved in the management and oversight of superannuation funds. The Act's provisions can be extended or modified through subordinate instruments, which provide further detail and regulatory guidance. Exclusions and exemptions within the Act are limited, and it does not specify particular thresholds for triggering disqualification beyond the seriousness of contraventions. A disqualified person under the Act, such as Annabelle Dean, is prohibited from acting in any capacity related to the management of superannuation entities, with significant penalties for non-compliance. This disqualification can be appealed or potentially revoked under certain conditions, but the seriousness of the contraventions remains a key determinant in such decisions.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) provides a framework for the regulation of superannuation entities in Australia, ensuring that trustees, investment managers, and custodians adhere to strict standards. Under section 126A of the SISA, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, such as Emma Rosenzweig, has the authority to disqualify individuals from acting in responsible positions within superannuation entities if certain conditions are met. In the case of Annabelle Dean, she has been disqualified under subsection 126A(2) because it has been established that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA, and Annabelle was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions. The seriousness of these contraventions provided grounds for the disqualification.
The obligations imposed by the SISA on parties such as Annabelle Dean, particularly when they hold responsible positions within superannuation entities, are stringent. They must ensure compliance with all provisions of the SISA, including but not limited to, maintaining proper records, acting in the best interests of the superannuation members, and avoiding conflicts of interest. The Act also mandates that responsible officers must have the necessary qualifications and must be of good standing. Annabelle’s disqualification under section 126A highlights the seriousness with which the SISA treats non-compliance and the potential consequences for those who fail to meet these obligations.
Breaching the provisions of the SISA, particularly those that result in disqualification, can lead to severe consequences. Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or to be a responsible officer of a body corporate that holds such a position. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years imprisonment. This underscores the gravity of the disqualification and the importance of adhering to the requirements set out by the SISA. Additionally, the disqualification can be revoked under subsection 126A(5) either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application by the disqualified person. Annabelle Dean also has the right to request a reconsideration of the decision under section 344 of the SISA if she is dissatisfied with the outcome.