NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Anna Kathryn Tsouris - 2 November 2023
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Anna Kathryn Tsouris
MORTDALE NSW 2223
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I am satisfied that you’ve contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 2 November 2023
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Antonio Macolino
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to establish a robust regulatory framework for the supervision of superannuation funds, ensuring the protection of members' interests and the integrity of the superannuation system. The Act was introduced to address the need for stringent oversight of superannuation entities to safeguard members’ retirement savings. The SISA was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to provide the necessary tools for the Australian Taxation Office and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority to supervise and regulate the superannuation industry effectively. The policy objective of the SISA is to ensure that superannuation funds are managed responsibly and in the best interests of members, by imposing obligations on trustees, investment managers, and other responsible officers to comply with certain standards of conduct and governance. The notice of disqualification under the SISA, such as the one issued to Anna Kathryn Tsouris, serves to enforce these standards and deter misconduct by disqualifying individuals found to have contravened the Act's provisions.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals who are involved in the administration or management of superannuation funds, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers. The Act extends its reach to cover any conduct or transactions that contravene its provisions, with the scope of application being national in nature as it is a Commonwealth Act. In the case of Anna Kathryn Tsouris, her disqualification under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA is specifically due to her contraventions of the Act, which have been deemed serious enough to warrant such action. The disqualification is enforceable immediately upon the notice being issued. Furthermore, the Act provides for the publication of such disqualifications as Notifiable Instruments in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and public awareness of the disqualification of individuals in the superannuation industry. Additionally, the Act includes provisions for the potential revocation of the disqualification and offers recourse for the disqualified individual to seek reconsideration of the decision by the Commissioner within a specified timeframe.
Key Provisions
The key provisions of the notice pertain to the disqualification of Anna Kathryn Tsouris from acting in certain capacities within the superannuation industry. Under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), the Commissioner of Taxation, represented by Emma Rosenzweig, has formally disqualified Anna from roles due to contraventions of the Act. This disqualification is based on the seriousness of the breaches, as detailed in subsection 126A(1). The notice specifies that the disqualification is effective from the date of its issuance.
The SISA imposes significant obligations on parties like Anna, particularly in relation to compliance with the Act's requirements. Under section 126K of the SISA, Anna, being a disqualified person, is prohibited from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or being a responsible officer or a body corporate in such roles. This mandate is crucial in maintaining the integrity and oversight of superannuation entities. Failure to comply with these obligations can lead to serious legal repercussions.
Breaching the provisions of the SISA by continuing to act in the restricted capacities despite being disqualified is a serious offence. Under section 126K, the maximum penalty for such an offence is two years imprisonment, highlighting the gravity of non-compliance. The notice also mentions that details of this disqualification will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and public awareness.
Moreover, the notice provides recourse for Anna. Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification may be revoked either by the authority on its own initiative or following a written application by Anna. Additionally, under section 344 of the SISA, Anna has the right to request a reconsideration of the decision within 21 days of receiving the notice, provided she submits a written request outlining the reasons for her dissatisfaction with the decision.