NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – ANGELA SAMMUT - 12 May 2025
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
ANGELA SAMMUT
STUARTS POINT NSW 2441
I, Emma Rosenzweig, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 12 May 2025
Emma Rosenzweig
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Jaq McDougall
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted to address the need for effective regulation and supervision of the superannuation industry in Australia, ensuring the protection of superannuation funds and the interests of members. The Act was established to create a framework for the oversight of trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities, thereby mitigating risks and enhancing accountability within the sector. The SISA was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament and aims to safeguard the integrity and financial stability of superannuation funds, ensuring that trustees and related officers adhere to high standards of conduct and compliance. The disqualification of Angela Sammut under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA is a direct application of this legislative intent, reflecting the serious consequences for responsible officers found to have contravened the Act’s provisions.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and management of superannuation entities, including trustees, responsible officers, and corporate trustees. The act has a national reach, applying across Australia, and governs the conduct and transactions related to superannuation funds. A notable exclusion pertains to the disqualification of individuals from roles such as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities if they are found to have contravened the provisions of the SISA. The disqualification can be imposed by a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation if it is determined that the individual was a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions and the seriousness of the breaches warrants such action. This disqualification can be revoked either on the initiative of the delegate or upon written application by the disqualified individual. Additionally, the act allows for the publication of disqualification details as Notifiable Instruments in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and accountability within the superannuation industry.
Key Provisions
The notice of disqualification under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) serves to inform Angela Sammut that she has been disqualified from performing certain roles related to superannuation entities. This disqualification is due to the conviction that she was a responsible officer of a corporate trustee that contravened the SISA on one or more occasions. The severity of these contraventions is deemed significant enough to warrant her disqualification. This notice, as stated in subsection 126A(7), will be officially published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
The SISA imposes various obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. In this context, it mandates that a person, such as Angela Sammut, who has been found to be a responsible officer during periods when the corporate trustee committed contraventions, must be disqualified if the contraventions are serious enough. Furthermore, section 126K of the SISA requires that any disqualified person refrain from acting as a trustee, investment manager, custodian of a superannuation entity, or a responsible officer of such a body corporate. These obligations are designed to ensure compliance with the SISA and protect the interests of superannuation entities and their beneficiaries.
Breaching the terms of the disqualification notice can have serious legal consequences. As outlined in section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act in any capacity within a superannuation entity. The maximum penalty for this offence is two years imprisonment. Additionally, the disqualification can be revoked under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, either on the initiative of the Commissioner or upon a written application from the disqualified person. If Angela Sammut is dissatisfied with the decision, she has the right to request a reconsideration by the Commissioner, as stipulated in section 344 of the SISA. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice, detailing the reasons why she believes the decision is incorrect.