NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION - Anestis Kalaitzis - 28 April 2026
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Anestis Kalaitzis
PORTARIA VOLOU
NOMOS MAGNESIA
GREECE
I, Ben Kelly, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 28 April 2026
Ben Kelly
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Sherad Samuel
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Commonwealth Parliament to address significant regulatory gaps in the supervision and management of superannuation entities, ensuring that trustees, investment managers, and custodians operate within the legal framework designed to protect the interests of superannuation fund members. The Act was introduced to provide a robust regulatory environment that minimises the risk of misconduct and financial mismanagement within the superannuation sector. The policy objective of the SISA is to safeguard the financial wellbeing of superannuation fund members by imposing stringent requirements on the entities that manage these funds and by empowering the Australian Taxation Office to take decisive action against non-compliance and misconduct.
The notice of disqualification issued under the SISA to Anestis Kalaitzis exemplifies the Act’s intent to enforce accountability among responsible officers of superannuation entities. By disqualifying Mr. Kalaitzis due to the contravention of the Act by the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities, the legislation underscores its commitment to penalising serious breaches that threaten the integrity of the superannuation system. The disqualification not only imposes a direct penalty on the individual but also serves as a deterrent to others who might consider engaging in similar misconduct.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to responsible officers within corporate trustees of superannuation entities. The act, which is of Commonwealth reach, is designed to maintain the integrity of the superannuation industry by imposing obligations and prohibitions on trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers. The disqualification provisions under section 126A of the SISA are particularly pertinent to individuals such as Anestis Kalaitzis, who have been found to have contravened the act’s provisions while acting in their capacity as a responsible officer. This disqualification extends to preventing the individual from being or acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, as outlined in section 126K of the act. Additionally, the act provides for the possibility of disqualification revocation under subsection 126A(5) either on the initiative of the delegate or upon written application by the disqualified person. Notably, any disqualification notice, as in the case of Anestis Kalaitzis, is published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and public awareness.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) in this context are sections 126A and 126K. Section 126A(6) allows a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify a person from being a responsible officer of a corporate trustee of a superannuation entity if they are satisfied that the corporate trustee has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualification. Section 126A(7) mandates that details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation. Furthermore, section 126K imposes an offence for a disqualified person, who knows they are disqualified, to be or act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of such an entity. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years imprisonment.
The Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. It mandates that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must provide written notice of disqualification under section 126A(6) when disqualifying a person, as demonstrated in the notice given to Anestis Kalaitzis. The Act also requires that the disqualification takes effect on the day it is made, and that details of the disqualification must be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation under section 126A(7). Moreover, the Act requires that any disqualified person refrain from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of such an entity, as outlined in section 126K.
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 imposes several consequences for breaches of its provisions. Under section 126K, it is an offence for a disqualified person to be, or act as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of such an entity. The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years imprisonment. Additionally, the Act provides for the revocation of a disqualification under subsection 126A(5) either on the initiative of the delegate or upon written application by the disqualified person. Furthermore, section 344 allows an affected person who is dissatisfied with the disqualification decision to request the Commissioner to reconsider the decision in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of the decision, providing reasons why the decision is thought to be wrong.