NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Mr Andrew Couchman
Clifton Springs VIC 3222
I, James O’Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the nature, seriousness and the number of contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 23 May 2017
James O’Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Bernadette Stewart
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A (7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A (5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to address significant concerns about the governance and management of superannuation funds, ensuring that these funds are properly supervised and managed for the benefit of superannuation members. The legislation aimed to fill a critical gap in the regulation of the superannuation industry by establishing a robust framework for oversight and compliance, designed to protect the interests of superannuation members and maintain confidence in the system. The policy objective behind the Act is to provide effective regulation to ensure the financial soundness of superannuation entities and the fair treatment of superannuation members.
This Act empowers the Commissioner of Taxation to disqualify individuals who have contravened the Act, ensuring that those who breach the regulatory standards are held accountable. The formal disqualification process, as evidenced by the notice issued to Mr. Andrew Couchman, underscores the seriousness with which the Act treats non-compliance, and the potential consequences, including criminal penalties, for disqualified individuals who continue to engage in prohibited activities. The Act also provides mechanisms for reconsideration and potential revocation of disqualification, offering a pathway for rectification and compliance.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the superannuation industry, including trustees, investment managers, custodians, and responsible officers of superannuation entities. The Act operates on a national level, governed by the Commonwealth, to regulate and oversee the conduct of the superannuation industry. In this specific case, Mr Andrew Couchman, residing in Clifton Springs, Victoria, has been disqualified under the Act for contravening its provisions. The disqualification bars him from acting in roles such as trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity or being a responsible officer for such entities. The disqualification is effective from the date of issuance. Additionally, the Act mandates that such disqualifications be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette, ensuring transparency and public awareness of the action taken. Furthermore, the Act outlines severe penalties for those who continue to operate in contravention of the disqualification, with a potential maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. The disqualification can be subject to revocation either by the authority or upon application by the disqualified individual. If Mr Couchman is dissatisfied with the decision, he has the right to request a reconsideration by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice, providing reasons for his dissatisfaction.
Key Provisions
The notice provided under subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) informs Mr Andrew Couchman that he has been disqualified from certain roles related to superannuation entities. This disqualification is due to his contravention of the SISA on one or more occasions, with the nature, seriousness, and number of these contraventions warranting such action. The disqualification takes effect immediately from the date of the notice. According to subsection 126A(1) of the SISA, the grounds for this disqualification are based on Mr Couchman's breaches of the Act, which have been deemed severe enough to merit his exclusion from participating in the superannuation industry.
Under the SISA, the disqualification imposes strict obligations on Mr Couchman. Notably, as stated in Note 2, it is an offence for a disqualified person to act as a trustee, investment manager, custodian, responsible officer, or body corporate that holds any of these roles within a superannuation entity. This means Mr Couchman cannot engage in any activities that involve the management or oversight of superannuation funds. The legal ramifications of this prohibition are significant, as any violation of these restrictions can lead to severe penalties.
The consequences for breaching these provisions are outlined in section 126K of the SISA. If Mr Couchman, knowing he is disqualified, continues to act in any capacity as mentioned, he commits an offence that carries a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment. Additionally, under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, there is a provision for the disqualification to be revoked either by the authority's initiative or upon a written application by Mr Couchman. This provides a potential avenue for him to regain his eligibility under certain conditions.
In the event that Mr Couchman is dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, he has the right to request a reconsideration under section 344 of the SISA. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving the notice and should detail the reasons why he believes the decision is incorrect. This process allows for a formal review of the decision, offering a legal recourse for those who feel their disqualification was unjust.