| Commonwealth of Australia | Gazette |
Published by the Commonwealth of Australia | GOVERNMENT NOTICES |
NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Andrew Antoniou
BEXLEY NORTH NSW 2207
I, James O'Halloran, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(1) of the SISA.
I have disqualified you as I am satisfied that you have contravened the SISA on one or more occasions and the number of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 14 November 2018
James O'Halloran
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Michael Lazzaroni
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published in the Commonwealth Government Notices Gazette.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to regulate the superannuation industry, ensuring that it operates efficiently, economically, and with adequate levels of protection for the public and members of superannuation funds. The Act was introduced to address the need for effective oversight and regulation of the superannuation industry, particularly in light of the growing importance of superannuation as a major component of retirement savings in Australia. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity of the superannuation system and to protect the interests of members of superannuation funds. The Act provides for the establishment of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) as the primary regulators of the superannuation industry. The notice of disqualification under the SISA serves to highlight the serious consequences of contravening the provisions of the Act, with the potential for disqualification from involvement in the management of superannuation entities and significant penalties for continued non-compliance.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and management of superannuation entities within Australia. This legislation is of Commonwealth jurisdiction and thus has a national reach, impacting all entities and individuals operating in the superannuation industry across the country. The Act targets specific conduct, particularly breaches that undermine the integrity and proper management of superannuation funds, and it includes provisions for disqualifying individuals found to have contravened its stipulations. The application of the Act is extended through subordinate instruments, allowing for the creation of regulations that further define and enforce its provisions. As per the notice of disqualification given to Andrew Antoniou, the Act includes exclusions and exemptions that are contingent on compliance with its requirements; however, the contravention of its terms, particularly as noted in the disqualification notice, leads to stringent consequences such as disqualification from roles within superannuation entities. The Act also outlines specific criminal penalties for disqualified persons who continue to act in restricted capacities, reinforcing its stringent regulatory framework.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) contains provisions for the disqualification of individuals involved in the supervision of superannuation entities. Section 126A(1) allows for the disqualification of a person who has contravened the SISA, with the number of contraventions being a key factor in the decision. Section 126A(6) mandates that a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation must issue a notice of disqualification, which was done in this case for Andrew Antoniou. This disqualification takes immediate effect on the date of the notice, as specified in the document.
The obligations imposed by the SISA on individuals like Andrew Antoniou include adherence to the Act's provisions to avoid disqualification. Once disqualified, individuals are legally prohibited from acting as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities, or as responsible officers of such entities. Section 126K outlines these prohibitions and establishes severe penalties for non-compliance, including a potential two-year jail term. Additionally, section 126A(5) allows for the possibility of revocation of the disqualification, either on the initiative of the Commissioner or through a written application by the disqualified person.
The consequences of breaching the SISA's provisions are stringent, with significant civil and criminal penalties. Section 126K explicitly states that knowingly acting in a prohibited capacity while disqualified is an offence, with a maximum penalty of two years in jail. This reflects the seriousness of the Act's intent to protect the superannuation industry. Furthermore, section 344 provides a recourse for individuals dissatisfied with the disqualification decision, allowing them to request a reconsideration from the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice. This ensures that there is a formal process for addressing grievances related to the disqualification.