NOTICE OF DISQUALIFICATION – Ana Marie Salazar - 18 May 2026
Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993
To:
Ana Marie Salazar
CAMPBELLTOWN NSW 2560
I, Ben Kelly, a delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation, give you notice as required by subsection 126A(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA), that I have disqualified you under subsection 126A(2) of the SISA.
I’ve disqualified you as I’m satisfied that the corporate trustee of one or more superannuation entities has contravened the SISA on one or more occasions, and at the time of the contraventions you were a responsible officer of the corporate trustee and the seriousness of the contraventions provides grounds for disqualifying you.
The disqualification takes effect on the day on which it is made.
Dated: 18 May 2026
Ben Kelly
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
Per Debbi Smith
Note 1:
Under subsection 126A(7) of the SISA, details of this disqualification notice will be published as a Notifiable Instrument in the Federal Register of Legislation.
Note 2:
Under section 126K of the SISA, it is an offence for a disqualified person, who knows that he or she is a disqualified person, to be, or act as a:
› trustee, investment manager or custodian of a superannuation entity
› responsible officer or a body corporate that is a trustee, investment manager or custodian, of a superannuation entity
The maximum penalty for committing this offence is two years jail.
Note 3:
Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, we may revoke this disqualification on our own initiative or on your written application.
Note 4:
Under section 344 of the SISA, if you are affected by this decision and are not satisfied with it, you can ask the Commissioner to reconsider the decision. This request must be made in writing within 21 days of receiving notice of this decision and must give the reasons you think the decision is wrong.
Overview
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) was enacted by the Parliament of Australia to regulate the superannuation industry, ensuring that superannuation entities are managed in the best interests of their members. The Act addresses the problem of inadequate supervision and management of superannuation funds by establishing a robust framework for the regulation of trustees, investment managers, and custodians of superannuation entities. The policy objective of the Act is to maintain the integrity and stability of the superannuation industry, thereby protecting the financial security of superannuation members. The notice provided to Ana Marie Salazar under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA serves as an example of the enforcement mechanisms within the Act, where individuals found to have contravened its provisions can be disqualified from holding responsible positions within superannuation entities. The disqualification is intended to deter serious breaches and uphold the standards required for the proper management of superannuation funds.
Scope and Application
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) applies to individuals and entities involved in the supervision and management of superannuation entities. Specifically, it targets responsible officers of corporate trustees who may have contravened the provisions of the SISA, leading to potential disqualification under subsection 126A(2). This Act has a Commonwealth reach, impacting superannuation entities across Australia. The notice of disqualification, as seen in the case of Ana Marie Salazar, informs the individual of their disqualification and the subsequent prohibition from acting as a trustee, investment manager, or custodian of a superannuation entity, or as a responsible officer of such entities, as per section 126K of the Act. The disqualification is effective immediately upon issuance. Furthermore, the Act provides for the publication of such disqualification notices in the Federal Register of Legislation, ensuring transparency and public awareness of disqualified individuals. There are also provisions for the revocation of disqualification and avenues for reconsideration of the decision within a specified timeframe.
Key Provisions
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SISA) outlines specific provisions for disqualifying individuals from certain roles within superannuation entities. Section 126A(2) allows for the disqualification of individuals who are responsible officers of a corporate trustee that has contravened the Act, particularly when the seriousness of the contraventions warrants such action. In this case, Ana Marie Salazar has been disqualified under subsection 126A(6) of the SISA due to her role as a responsible officer at the time of the contraventions. The disqualification takes immediate effect on the date of notice, which in this instance is 18 May 2026.
The Act imposes obligations on disqualified individuals, such as Ana Marie Salazar, prohibiting them from acting as trustees, investment managers, or custodians of superannuation entities. Specifically, section 126K of the SISA makes it an offence for a disqualified person to assume or continue in such roles. The seriousness of these obligations is underscored by the potential consequences, including a maximum penalty of two years imprisonment for knowingly breaching these provisions. This legal framework ensures that individuals who have been found to have contravened the SISA in a significant manner are prevented from continuing to manage or influence superannuation entities.
The legislation also provides pathways for the revocation of disqualification. Under subsection 126A(5) of the SISA, the disqualification may be revoked either by the delegate of the Commissioner of Taxation on their own initiative or upon a written application by the disqualified person. This flexibility allows for reconsideration and potential reinstatement based on changed circumstances or evidence of rehabilitation.
Additionally, the SISA provides a mechanism for appeal. Section 344 allows an affected person to request a reconsideration of the disqualification decision by the Commissioner within 21 days of receiving the notice. This reconsideration request must be made in writing and must detail the reasons why the individual believes the decision is incorrect. This provision ensures that there is an opportunity for due process and for the individual to present their case for why the disqualification should not stand or be reconsidered.